My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
03-16-1998 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2023 1:13:49 PM
Creation date
7/27/2023 1:05:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance <br />for any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for the property in the zone where <br />the affected person's land is located. <br />The deck is permitted in this zoning district. <br />The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar <br />to such property or immediately adjoining property. <br />The residence is on a lot of record that does not meet current zoning requirements. Due to <br />the limited lot size, meeting hardcover and lakeshore setback restrictions is difficult. The <br />property is also located at the end of a long shared driveway and its location on this <br />driveway is the reason for it being located closer to the lake than the adjacent residences. <br />The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district <br />in which said land is located. <br />The immediately adjoining properties were also platted prior to current zoning requirements <br />but they were not built as close to the lakeshore. <br />The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment <br />of a substantial property right of the applicant. <br />The applicants would not be able to retain the deck replacement without the granting of <br />variances. <br />8. The granting of such variances will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The deck replacement is similar to the previous one and would not intensify non <br />conformance beyond what existed. <br />Issues <br />1.The property does not meet lot area or width requirements. The substandard lot size creates <br />a difficulty in meeting hardcover and lakeshore setback requirements. <br />2.Variances were granted in 1992 to allow the garage on the southwest portion of the lot. The <br />intent of the garage was to replace several accessory structures on the property that had a <br />greater combined footprint. <br />M2351 Laura Zauner <br />3262 North Shore Drive <br />Variances <br />March 16. 1998 <br />Page^ <br />1 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.