Laserfiche WebLink
3.The majority of the residence is already ahead of the average lakeshore setback. Allowing <br />the deck to remain would not further encroach on neighboring views beyond what has <br />historically existed. <br />4.The applicant had removed several hardcover areas in the O' to 75' lakeshore setback when <br />the deck was rebuilt, which resulted in a decrease in hardcover in this setback. It is not clear <br />why the 75' to 250' setback has been revised to reflect a .2% increase over what had been <br />approved with the variance in 1992. Even with this increase, there has still been a net <br />decrease of hardcover on the lot. <br />5.Much of the hardcover in 75' to 250' setback is accounted for by the shared loop driveway <br />that crosses the property. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends approval of the necessary after-the-fact variances to allow the retention of a <br />rebuilt 18' by 19' deck on the lake side of the residence. <br />SUiff recommends approval of a hardcover variance to allow 15.1% to remain in the O' to 75' <br />lakeshore setback where none is allowed. <br />Staff recommends approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to allow 39' <br />encroachment to remain where none is allowed. <br />Staff recommends approval of a lakeshore setback variance of 40.7' to allow the deck to <br />remain 34.3 ’ from the OHWL where 75' is required. <br />Attachments <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Location Map <br />Topographic Map <br />Permit Record <br />Survey With Hardcover Calculations <br />Applicant's Statement of Hardship <br />U235I Laura Zauner <br />3262 North Shore Drive <br />Variances <br />March !6,1998 <br />Pages <br />\ <br />'ar I <br />I