Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock pm. <br />7. #15-3763 CHRISTOPHER W. BOLLIS, 200-350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH — <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued) <br />The City does not require buffers, but the Watershed District buffers impact the develop ability of the site. <br />Each of the lots has two acres of dry buildable land outside of the wetlands but the two acres includes area <br />within the buffers. The buffers are not excluded from the dry buildable. <br />Each lot is required to have two acres of dry land as well as a 200 -foot width at the 50 -foot setback line <br />from the street. The first three lots have 100 feet at the 50 -foot line. Lots 4, 5, and 6 do not reach that <br />width until further back on the lot, which technically requires a variance. The applicants have shown that <br />within each of those lots there is a building envelope and septic sites that meet the required setbacks and <br />standards based on one part of the City Code. Gaffron noted state code does not require a setback from a <br />wetland as long as the soils meet state requirements. The City Code for septic systems requires a 50 -foot <br />setback from the edge of the wetland. The Shoreland Ordinance also establishes that where there are <br />buffers being required by the Watershed District, the setback has to be equal to the buffer width plus ten <br />feet for structures and septic systems. Gaffron stated the City has not experienced in the past a 75 -foot <br />buffer requirement. <br />In this case there are a number of septic systems where the absorption area of the mound system meets the <br />50 -foot setback in all but one case but they do not meet an 85 -foot setback. The City has historically <br />required a75 -foot setback from the wetlands, which was reduced down to 50. The state requires 0. In <br />Staff's view a 50 -foot setback is adequate. Gaffron indicated he did speak with the Watershed District on <br />whether a septic system can go into a buffer. While the Watershed District does not prohibit it, they do <br />recommend against it. One of the reasons is if a 75 -foot buffer is required to be established, once the <br />house is constructed and the septic system is put into that area, there is a 5 -year monitoring program as <br />part of their buffer maintenance requirement. <br />Gaffron stated each of these lots has a likely location for a well 50 feet from any septic system and that he <br />does not expect there to be any issues with providing wells on each lot. <br />Gaffron stated a question that has been asked is whether or not what is remaining on the lots is actually <br />buildable. Gaffron indicated there are a number of locations where the house could move further south <br />and Staff does not believe that will be an issue. <br />The proposed single-family development is consistent with existing development in the surrounding <br />neighborhood. Similar single-family lots with 2 -plus acre lot sizes exist to the north, while the lots within <br />Kintyre Two to the immediate south range from 1.4 to 3 -plus acres. <br />The portion of the property to be developed for new single-family lots is somewhat remote from the <br />surrounding public roads. The property slopes downward generally from a high point at the southwest to <br />a large wetland complex to the northeast and east. A smaller wetland to the northwest will also impact <br />development of the site. <br />Outlot A is part of the property that is being subdivided but the applicants are proposing at this time not to <br />develop Outlot A. Outlot A will not be buildable until at some point in the future it is re -platted into one <br />or two building lots. There is a potential for three and possibly four lots with access off of Stubbs Bay <br />Road or Kintyre. <br />Page 9 of 32 <br />