My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
08-10-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 9:52:36 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 9:51:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2015 <br />7:00 o'clock pm. <br />7. #15-3763 CHRISTOPHER W. BOLLIS, 200-350 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH — <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT (continued) <br />City Code standards says that a cul-de-sac road should be no longer than 1,000 feet in length. This <br />cul-de-sac will be 1,550 feet in length. The City has quite a number of private roads with cul-de-sacs that <br />have that characteristic. Staffhas spoken with the fire chief about his concerns and he said it is very <br />likely that each one of these lots will have a house on it that exceeds the threshold for requiring a fire <br />suppression sprinkler system. Based on that, the fire chief is not at all concerned with the length of the <br />road as long as they maintain an adequate width. The existing Kintyre Road is 24 feet in paved width <br />with an 80 -foot paved cul-de-sac. The applicants initially proposed a width of more than 24 feet but the <br />current proposal is to have a surmountable curb for a good share of the length of the road. Back of curb <br />to back of curb is a 30 -foot width, which would mean the road would widen as you approach this <br />development. <br />The neighbors have asked what happens to the existing cul-de-sac. One of the concerns of the fire chief <br />was that he does not want to see an island in the middle of it because the road will likely need to be <br />widened out further. Gaffron stated he is not sure if the neighborhood would be acceptable of having a <br />through road in this area. Gaffron noted the existing road does end before you reach the next property up. <br />Gaffron noted the City, in its original approvals in 2006 for Kintyre Two, required that the applicant <br />provide the ability for the next property up to be accessed, which is Outlot D. The developer of Kintyre <br />has provided the City with an easement document that allows the extension of that road. It was the City's <br />intent both at the preliminary plat approval and final plat approval that Kintyre Lane be extended further <br />to the north or at least have that available. <br />The Applicants have been advised of the ability to build houses that have three stories. The plans in front <br />of the City Council have a grading plan that indicates that certain of the building sites will have pads <br />graded to make sure that when the City reviews the building plans, that they will have now created as a <br />new grade in order to construct homes with basements rather than three or three and a half stories. <br />As it relates to the landscaping plan, the applicants are proposing to place a number of trees along the <br />road to help buffer between the existing houses and along lot lines. In addition, the applicants are <br />proposing a number of trees to screen from the south. The applicants will also attempt to save as many <br />trees as possible but there will still need to be a number of trees removed. City Code requires that one <br />tree for every 40 feet of boulevard be planted, but in the past the Council has not required that and Staff <br />would ask that the Council provide some direction on the layout of trees. <br />Lot width variances are required for Lots 4, 5, and 6 and it is not unusual for the City to grant those. <br />Gaffron stated the existing driveway corridor serves as a driveway entrance to the house at 350 Stubbs <br />Bay North. The applicant has been asked what his intent is for that corridor and he has indicated at the <br />present time he has no plans. Gaffron stated the applicant can address that as to his intent for that <br />corridor. <br />Walsh noted the property on either side of that road is not owned by Mr. Bollis but he just has an interest <br />in that road. <br />Page 10 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.