My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-07-1983 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983 Planning Packets
>
02-07-1983 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2023 12:15:14 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 3:55:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
conditions <br />in property <br />id the exist- <br />:ther west is <br />lersection of <br />i access further <br />;s onto CSAH 84, <br />le Public Works <br />ttenpting to come <br />d. I have advised <br />o the size of that <br />sire to acquire <br />lides of her <br />erty platted <br />* with a <br />have been <br />h merely a <br />ning Commission <br />:his variance <br />ify all improv- <br />he parcel to be <br />solve all future <br />corridor permit <br />tandard setback <br />30* existing). <br />and north on the <br />ck required 50* <br />m <br />. V- <br />mm <br />m <br />■I - <br />> <br />S'I? <br />m <br />existing 160') . existing structure. The addition of <br />effect future expansion plan^ “ a new house to be constructed on <br />the 49* X 218' corridor will standars of the RR-IA Zoning District, <br />the proposed lot meeting all sett , c ^ building envelope in consider- <br />The lot would indeed have the west. The building <br />ation of the severe slope ot. tne propurry <br />envelope measures 130' X -12'. <br />b) Addition of \_J}£1± <br />The lot would now satisfy the minimum area requirement o^^^ ^ minimum <br />lots. The applicant's attorney and^st.ffjtrongiy^^^^^ ^ <br />the one acre addition. T ->^.:inuitG area for septic expansion and any <br />other^typrof^impro^^ '"o^b-''set\sid4 for^thrsubsLnd^rd^ <br />lot ll tS'east!"" Twoutf suggest tha^ we^limit this review to consideration <br />of the Dunn lot. <br />If you choose this ^,;/iot‘"and’'?hl fact thaJ^irwIs an^approvldhistory of the ownership or the lo <br />legal subdivision in 1971. <br />c) Addition of 4 acres <br />, d. rifv's Dosition on lots of common owner-The requirement would uphold the Ci y P . District be upheld and <br />fei^ ^t^^f^^e^nUufhifto^y o'f fhl ?“;^Lrany\^«^g in conlideration <br />of the current status of the property. <br />STAFF recommendation <br />To approve the lot area and lire^rearrangement subdivision <br />Inc. subject to the 4 acre parcll be combined <br />with the City requiring 49 X , aavsid<=> Road and that access to the <br />«c.u.y «o.a. <br />h <br />4 <br />Wnif. <br />OT <br />' 'vi. <br />Ml <br />f <br />p:- <br />TO; <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />This is < <br />which wa <br />large eni <br />done c\z > <br />indicatii <br />required <br />’'multi-c( <br />ling. I <br />been fil <br />exist on <br />a mound < <br />line sho <br />strip 21 <br />2410 (sei <br />parcel wi <br />I would <br />size if <br />Please n< <br />north bo- <br />road eas' <br />are (226- <br />width of <br />Also, th< <br />north fr< <br />exists hi <br />Assuming <br />about 46 <br />within e:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.