Laserfiche WebLink
orth will not <br />addition of <br />structed on <br />A Zoning District, <br />elope in consider— <br />•he building <br />rural residential <br />lend at a minimum <br />i more reasonable <br />>ansion and any <br />i attorney goes as <br />the substandard <br />Lew to consideration <br />n on the unique <br />was an approved <br />f common owner- <br />be upheld and <br />n consideration <br />n of Ski-Tonka <br />ment subdivision <br />be combined <br />ccess to the <br />i -•» <br />m <br />m <br />m- m <br />m- <br />EXHIBIT d. <br />TO; <br />FROM; <br />DATE; <br />Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Septic System Inspector <br />January 17, 1983 <br />SUBJECT; #722, 4740 Dayside Road, Brent Primus, Site Evaluation <br />for Septic Systems <br />This is an existing 1+ Acre Lot with existing house and septic system <br />which was repaired in 1980. Testing was done to show that the lot is <br />large enough to support all future septic system needs. Testing was <br />done at a site with 10-15% slopes. Perc Rates averaged 27MPI. No <br />indication of the presence or absence of mottling was given, as is <br />required in the Orono Design Manual. The boring log does indicate <br />"multi-colcred clay" at depth, which may or may not be mott­ <br />ling. I was not able tc .vutain samples to peruse since the holes had <br />been filled in. However, should a perched seasonal water table actually <br />exist on the site at some time, the tested site would not be suitable for <br />a mound due to the slope. In my opinion, flat land north of the property <br />line should be added to the lot in an amount of at least 1/4 acre+. The <br />strip 218' wide by 49' deep, continueing the rear lot line of parcel <br />2410 (see sketch) would be suitable. Adding land west of the existing <br />parcel would be of little value for septic system due to slopes. <br />I would further recommend that the lot be brought up to a 2.0 acre minimum <br />size if possible, which is the standard for unsewered lots in Orono. <br />Please note that according to the legal description on Dunn's deed, their <br />north boundary is 226 feet from the center of the road subject to a 33 <br />road easement, hence the actual existing lot dimensions for zoning purposes <br />are (226-33) 193' X 218* (or 232'depending on what is taken as the actual <br />width of the west 1/2 of the SWl/4 of the SWl/4) which is about .97 acre. <br />Also, the legal description in the tax records for parcel 2440 goes 253' <br />north from the center of the road, so a (253'-226') = 27' discrepancy <br />exists betv;een parcels 2430 and 2440, as shown on sketch "A” attached. <br />Assuming Dunn's deed description is correct, the existing north line is <br />about 46* north of the barn, and I suspect that the existing system ^ <br />within existing lot lines, but may not meet a 10' setback. <br />C00£ <br />Addresi 4^ ^ ^ <br />^ Standi <br />□ Mouni <br />Syv.emtvco □ other <br />i'eimif <br />Quildmg t\pe R V. !r> <br />SEPTIC TANKS <br />PrOiSer outlet ar i inlet <br />Height of tank bottom i*b< <br />D«AINFI c LD; Tcta'.'ii <br />Total trea*incnt orea Is't. 1 <br />I ype of filter martria^ t. <br />Distance from nearest blrj <br />Depth of fill over drain he <br />/JI /*^ A rf *