02-07-1983 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

122ional Use Peirait ision, PraliJBlnary ee fogerst (oad In. 55359 iouncil meeting from applicant king Oonmission aneement sub- combined with the arger parcel shall 3 Bavstde Road and inepin County •ceipt of r:. iittal of rawn on» please ^mmission Minutes upon review • • TO:Plan!iinq Commission PROM:jeanno A. Mabusth, Zoninq Administrator DATE:February 3, 1983 SUBJECT: ^^723 3ki-'Ionka, Inc. 4740 Baysidc Road - Variance Planning Comaiissicn Action - To deny or approve subject to conditions Exhibits: A) 3) C) D) E) Gaffron memo Hennepin County Highway Deptartment letter 1/27/83 Building Envelope with 49'X218' of additional land Revised sketch Oberhauser letter 1-19-83 The Hennepin County Highway Department has reviewed the Dunn property for the puroose of*improving the existing access. They find the exist ing access the only acceptable one. To move the access further west is not feasible because it would place it too close to the intersection of the Ring Route a.nd CSAH 84. The topography prevents a safe access further east. The larger Primus lot will not be approved for direct access onto CSAH 84. The access to this property will be via the Ring Route. The Public Works Director will approve all new curb cuts. I have been advised that the applicant and the Dunns are attempting to come to some form of an agreement on the sale of additional land. I have advised both parties that until Council acts, we have no idea as to the size of that lot. The Dunnr have stated for the public record their desire to acquire additional land from Primus. .Mrs. Dunn has been kind enough to submit photographs and slides of her property for review at the meeting. The surveyor has submitted a revised sketch showing the property platted to the centerline. The Dunn property now has a depth of 193' with a total lot area of 42074 sf. or .96 acres. The improvements have been relocated within the lot lines but at a 1" = 200'scale with merely a sketch there is no accuracy. At our last meeting, Planning Commission determined a subdivision would be required as a condition of this variance approval. The survey required for the subdivision will certify all improv- ments. Planning Commission must now determine the size of the parcel to be combined with the Dunn lot. 49' X 218' Corridor along North Property Line. Gaffron (Exhibit A) confirms that this is adequate area to solve all future qeotic needs. Per Oberhauser letter (Exhibit E) will this corridor permit ^ *gnsion of the existing house? Please remember the substandard setback to the east will prevent expansion on the east. (50' req., 30* existing). There adequate area nr.w to permit expansion to the west and north on the (rear setback req. 100' - existing 140', side setback required 50'house iM ■ M iwr i existing 160 effect futur the 49' X 21 the proposed The lot woul ation of the envelope mea b) Addition The lot woul lots. The c the one acr€ building en^ other type c far as askii lot to the i of the Dunn If you choo history of legal subdi Additio The require ship requir deny that t of the curr STAFF RECOM To approve Inc. subjec with the Ci with the pr larger pare