Laserfiche WebLink
84.PAGE 3 <br />ed what happened <br />see of property. <br />ted that that <br />18 acres ) stated <br />)ning and feared <br />Dpment would be <br />ming which would <br />stated that it is <br />iibility of sewer <br />?hy it would be 2 <br />room for septic <br />06 acres) stated <br />iph 34.001, says <br />cts shall have <br />public sanitary <br />•lA requires a 5 <br />om sewer. Achey <br />till is the 5 acre <br />2d. <br />d that there are <br />Plan where it <br />is aware that to <br />es is completely <br />with an alternate <br />:re zone is there <br />2d it that way and <br />it that it was the <br />t there is no worry <br />tated that in the <br />estimated in 1975 <br />0,000 per acre to <br />that it would cost <br />she didn't think <br />indication, that <br />.ir <br />m <br />m <br /><; <br />m <br />i <br />^ • • <br />A <br />>• <br />■■t% <br />■f <br />? V <br />^INUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 1984.PAGE 4 <br />PAINTERS CREEK <br />DEVELOPMENT iiilSsiiirli <br />they probably will be forced to have sewer <br />by the Metropolitan Sewer Commission. <br />Hugo Carlson of 4565 Bayside Road stated that the <br />McCulley Farms homes had no trouble selling with the <br />Council zoned that area for 5 acres for <br />the benefit of the community only 10 years ago. <br />Carlson asked why change it now. <br />Sr {H <br />stated\hat°f^'h^^ undeveloped land. Poisson <br />has always been his understanding that <br />changed because of a philosophical change on <br />the City s part or because there is a real hardship in <br />the case of the property owner. Poisson stated that <br />there IS no hardship here and why should it be resoned <br />to help someone make money. Poisson stated that it <br />PRD thlt the City. Poisson stated that any <br />that comes in has to meet current standards <br />to hL <br />statL*thiV^® happen to it. Poissonthat right now the neighbor can put one house on <br />the property next to him and if it was rezoned the <br />didn^t°th‘i°nk^‘^ t “■*' stated that he.-w ^ right to change that massive of a <br />whic^ woX involved in a referendumWhich would take it back to two acre zoning. <br />boundaries built in. Mabusth stated that it is indeed <br />stated thnf ^ zoning district. Mabusthstated that it is bounded by McCulley Road, luce line <br />it wa^ nature conservancy, that they felt <br />It was a locked in area. Mabusth noted that it is two <br />stree^^V^I """ right across thestreet. Mabusth stated that rezoning also has to be <br />stfS."'' """ Metropolitan CouncU as par state <br />Marc Frj tzJcT of 4 385 Chippewa Lane (5.5 acres) asked <br />11 tiU* .St reot.s v/oro to bo private streets.