Laserfiche WebLink
and makes the <br />in designed in <br />division. If <br />work design of <br />pads for 20 <br />sion is how to <br />Lding site and <br />rear- front, <br />to minimum lot <br />ng pad has not <br />il 2 acre zone? <br />I note several <br />svere a slope - <br />1 for building <br />m lot divided <br />site. <br />site. <br />to proposed <br />sed plan once <br />1 lines. <br />as part of the <br />e at 28* width <br />th'iun radius of <br />will provide <br />nage, erosion <br />: our meeting. <br />lding areas of <br />■o give County <br />additional 7 <br />1. The three <br />oposed access <br />T':-• .--V <br />j': - <br />|||■^|«| I \±..x:z <br />The Watershed District's report and requirement for <br />additional information will be transmitted to the applicant. Permi <br />review is required. <br />The City will ask for no revisions or new plans from the <br />applicant until the tezoning issue is resolved. <br />Review exhibit J. The property is divided ® <br />/district boundary line. The 2 staged subdivision design takes this <br />fac^intoSdl^allon- Staff has ^earned that it is Impossible to ask <br />school district to move boundary lines if it means loss in tax base. <br />Rezoning - <br />I have been informed that the neighbors will be out “ <br />neighborhood meetings are being held this weekend ± <br />current proposal. It is my understanding that the neighbors are in <br />complete opposition to the rezoning. <br />Issue for consideration during rezoning review. <br />a) Should the area to be rezoned include the 3 one acre sites <br />surrounded by project. <br />b) Is 2 acre zoning consistent with pattern of sorrounding <br />development. <br />c) What kinds of issues are valid in this type of review <br />1. public health, welfare and safety <br />2. dimunition in property values <br />3. consistency with intent of Comprehensive Plan and <br />Zoning Code <br />Planning Commission should listen and be prepared ® <br />recommendation. Upon a recommendation <br />will bring the rezoning portion of the application to the Council for <br />review and action. I cannot see doing any more detailed review of a <br />unit PRD nor asking for major revisions in plans until the rezoning <br />issue is resolved. <br />Review exhibits G, H & I. I have enclosed sections of the <br />Comprehensive Plan dealing with land use for the rural area^ Sections <br />from the State Statutes and Municipal Code to assist in your review. <br />determined necessary for a "legal" homestead site. <br />. /'i ¥ <br />' i <br />k <br />£ <br />mmg <br />X' <br />"‘a <br />iX. <br />Ifi-r <br />L-xEk:- <br />B <br />mi h <■ > <br />:x 5^ <br />?rA:' <br />“i,., <br />c- <br />11t Hi <br />Planni <br />Counci <br />the qu> <br />PRD su <br />rezoni <br />please <br />Code, <br />(revie <br />by pro