01-16-1984 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ation - Rezoning s per 66.6 r 66.6 dry - Rezoning portation Report it 40 Acre r 21, 1983 lots, all ;res. The sre is no : separate alternate >le tested h or mound for some of rmirn the questionable lots until he goes out on the site and makes the necessary soil borings. . ^ understand why the subdivision has been designed in the current format based on the many needs of a rural subdivision. If present format we would have a patch work design of Duilding pads, principal and alternate septic site pads for 20 residences, etc. My question to the Planning Commission is how to assure that each unit provides suitable area for a building site and what will the setbacks be from each lot line - side - rear- front. Section 38.610 states that lots in a PRD need not adhere to minimum lot size requirements for each building site. The building pad has not been desinated - what are feasible setbacks for the rural 2 acre zone? severly configuration I note several Lot 1, Block 1 - divided by a drainageway b) Lot 9, Block 1 — drainf ield located on too severe a slope — site^ appear to be suitable flat area for building c) Lot 10 - drainf ield located in drainage area lot divided by drainageway. d) Lot 11 - no suitable area for building site. e) Lot 13 - no suitable area for building site. p Lot 15 - drainfields located close to proposed drainageways - building site limited. g) Lot 16 - building site limited h) Lot 1, Block 2 - building site limited. Building pads should be designated on a revised plan once preferred setbacks are established from ownership lot lines. alignment. The engineer's report will provide LTtroi^ P*^°P°sed road design, drainage, erosion Po^ViirVhh * The engineer s report will be presented at our meeting. lot. 1, iS: "V”"i feet of right of way. We will hold to a 33' dedication. The three review the proposed access t .•••; - • f -Vr-: ■■r I I mm V.t.*; W 5V: i*ia add rev app dis fac sch Rez nei cur COIT re' wi re un is Co f r ap th ov d€