My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-20-1976 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1976
>
12-20-1976 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2023 1:22:29 PM
Creation date
6/22/2023 1:19:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ir ROAD s. <br />NING ACT <br />^ Ri>lK'rt .^otmson - 1121 r.lm k1 Avenue <br />/ Variance - Un Area m Width <br />Page 2 <br />PLANNING a)^f^ISSIO^’ MEPTING - November 15, 1976 <br />o <br />,/H <br />« ,* ». <br />Jim DeSplinter, recent purchaser of the property, presented some plans for a proposal <br />on subject lot. After brief revie\v, it was discovered that all detailed data as <br />requested vcas not noted on plans. Planning Cormnission requested necessary data. <br />Tabled proposal to give applicant opportunity to meet with Zoning Administrator to <br />resolve questions so proper plans can be submitted. <br />STAFF - Noveni>er 24, 1976 <br />New applicant, Mr. Jim DeSplinter, has come in with some revised plans, but they <br />weren’t complete (all potential problems were not resolved). If proper material <br />is submitted in time for mailing, we can consider application. <br />STAFF - Noveirt^er 30, 1976 <br />The applicant has submitted one plan of his proposal. The plan is too large for <br />Staff to duplicate oi our machines, so I'll present this single copy at the meeting <br />so we can consider the proposal. <br />I believe we should treat this as a work session item only as all problems have not <br />been resolved as yet. We could suggest a few dianges if necessary and instruct the <br />applicant to detain statements of no objections from tlie surrounding neighbors. <br />PLANNING Caf llSSIQN MEETING - Decemlier 6, 1976 <br />Plamiing Commission tabled this application as Mr. DeSplinter was not present. The <br />ZcMiing Administrator presented plan submitted to him by the applicant. Tlie plan <br />consisted of a dwelling and detadied garage. A variance would be re<iuire<i for the <br />right of way setback. Mr. DeSplinter is new considering an attached garage where <br />no setback v'ariances \>iould be required. Some regrading of the right of way would <br />be required, but letters of no objection would be required from affected adjoining <br />neiglibors. Bill Carlson and John Gerhardson of the I^blic Works Department <br />ins|X5Ctetl the site and reviewed Mr. DeSpl inter's proposal. They both agreed with t <br />the proposal of regrading of the right of way to to two feet providing culverts are <br />installed to provide natural drainage and manliole extensions be added by Mr. DeSplinter <br />if road grade is raised (subject to no objection from neighbors). Ricliard Tiegen <br />neighbor to the nortli was present, lie liad no olijection to the proposal, but was <br />concerned about tlie drainage. 'Hie Zoning Administrator informed him that the <br />applicant had agreed to install a 12" culvert to maintain the natural flow of the <br />runoff. <br />4 • <br />h <br />a.m.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.