My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
12-13-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 1:42:32 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. <br />8. <br />The DNR has stated it is opposed to the line under the trail. Long term maintenance appears <br />to be the main issue. Staff has met with representatives from the DNR and have determined <br />the DNR would issue a permit for extending the sewer along Brown Road to the south. They <br />have indicated this is the preferred location for a sewer line to cross the Luce Line Trail. <br />A small portion of the Tract G is platted to the center of Brown Road. Hennepin County has <br />indicated it would require the west 33' be dedicated to the County for right-of-way. <br />Tract G is owned by Mr. John Dunn. Mr. Dunn is not a co-applicant. He would be required <br />to sign the plat documents and dedicate easements over the lot in favor of the City of Orono. <br />The easements would be necessary for public utility and drainage purposes. The standard <br />road easement would be required should it become necessar)' for the City to acquire the road <br />and open it as a public road. <br />A Homeowner's Association shall be created for the maintenance of the private road and <br />drainage structures within the development. The owner of the 130 Brown Road property, <br />southwest of the development and south of Tmct G, has access from the private driveway <br />within Tract G and shall become part owner of a private road. <br />Sketch Plan <br />The City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed the proposal as part of the Sketch Plan <br />review process. Please note the attached Minutes (Exhibits J and K). <br />The City Council recommended to the property owner the City of Orono lias no intent to rezone the <br />property from the two acre standard. The Council has indicated they would consider developing the <br />site as a PRD and make a provision for sewer service. <br />Conformity to Zoning District Standards and Comprehensive Plan <br />The RR-1B zoning district allows a property to develop as a PRD as a conditional use. Under the <br />PRD the City can establish setbacks for each of the lots. The dr>' buildable areas of loi.s 1,2,3 and <br />4 are limited and arc between 1/2 acre to 1 acre dry buildable. The lots also are similar to the lots <br />located north of the development in the City of Long Lake. The proposed setbacks shown on the site <br />plan indicate a 35' front yard setback, 10 ’ side yard setback and a 30 ’ rear setback. The established <br />setbacks are similar to other lots in Orono that are zoned 1/2 acre to 1 acre in size. <br />Lots 5,6 and 7 are located south of the proposed private road and be subject to setback standards for <br />the RR-1 B zoning district. They would be developed with an average size close to two acres. They <br />would be a transition betw een the higher density to the north and the RR-IB two acre south of the <br />Luce Line Trail. All lots appear to provide suitable building sites based on sewer service being <br />available to the property. <br />Lot 7 is very wide and has ver> little lot depth. The property is bounded to the north by Long Lake <br />Creek and the South by the Luce Line Trail. 1 he rear yard setback is along the Trail. 1 he front yard <br />setback is 50', but Long Lake Creek is defined as a tributary stream and is within the shoreland <br />protection area. A 75' setback for structure and hardcover is required the same as they apply to <br />lakeshore areas. More detailed grading plans are required. The surveyor shall indicate on the plan <br />set the OHWL of the Creek and 75' structure setback.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.