My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
11-08-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2023 12:54:48 PM
Creation date
4/19/2023 12:51:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Project Costs <br />Project costs are estimated as follows: <br />Usm Description Estimated <br />Construction Cost <br />Lift Station No. 1 Mechanical & Electrical Rehabilitation $ 20,000 <br />Lift Station No. 2 Complete Replacement $ 80,000 <br />Forcemain Improvements near Lift Station No. 2 $ 5,000 <br />Lift Station No. 3 Complete Replacement $ 25,000 <br />Lift Station No. 4 Complete Replacement $ 20,000 <br />Lift Station No. 5 Complete Replacement $ 20.000 <br />Highway 12 <br />Bypass Lift Station New Construction $100,000 <br />Total Estimated Construction Cost $270,000 <br />10 % Contingency $27,000 <br />20 % Legal, Engineering, and Administration $54,000 <br />5 % Capitalized Interest and Bonding $14,000 <br />Total Estimated Project Cost $365,000 <br />If existing utility funds are to be used, the “5 % capitalized Interest and Bonding” line item should <br />be deleted from the cost summary. <br />Easement preparation and acquisition will be required for all of the lift station sites. The estimate <br />does not include easement costs that will be incurred on the project. An allowance for easement <br />costs should be added to the project budget. <br />It does not appear that Lift Station No. 5 is in need of immediate replacement. If desired, the <br />replacement of Lift Station No. 5 could be delayed for several years, which would lower project <br />costs by $20,000 to $30,000. <br />K:\l J9\ 1399910T\wor^reportsUetur report Joe
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.