Laserfiche WebLink
'1 <br />3. <br />4. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this amendment on March 15, 1999 <br />and recommended approval of the proposed amendment based upon the <br />following unique findings and hardships: <br />The proposed roof line change would raise the roof line. <br />B. <br />C. <br />D. <br />The concrete front stoop is located over a basement. <br />The subject property does not currently meet the lot area requirements. <br />The revised plan would not increase hardcover or structural coverage on <br />the lot. <br />The approved site plan would not be altered by the changes proposed by <br />the applicant. <br />F. The change to the roof design is to alleviate future problems with ice <br />dams. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />% <br />The plan meets the intent of the approvals granted in 1997, per Resolution No. <br />3891. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />i