My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
02-22-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:36:46 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:33:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
02 ’1999 FRI 10:23 FAX 0OOS <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 8,1999 <br />(H4) U2425 SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBEES/SERVICB 800, INC, 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - Continued <br />Jnbbour said Mr. Ott«i probably wants a public road all the way to the rear of the property. <br />Otten said there is a similar situation between the Burger King and the bank. <br />S:uisevere said if Mr. Otten is going to develop the property, it should be incumbent upon him <br />t(» provide another access rather than having a contingency for Service 800. <br />R ich Kieman of KM builders said that if that situation does arise and the applicant is <br />e xperiencing problems getting in and out, they would be the ones asking the City to work <br />something out to allow better access. The site is designed to enable an access farther to the <br />north. <br />Kelley said parking is often lacking in commercial development and he is concerned about the <br />fiiture. <br />J:\bbour asked how the C ">uncil would feel about abandoning the road portion of the City’s <br />e^iaement and keeping the utility and conservation easement tliat goes to the back of the <br />property. <br />Kelley said he would consider it after new Highway 12 is built. <br />Jabbour smd the Council is on record opposing a road behind the property. <br />h loorse said this is not the time to make a decision whether to give up the road right-of-way. <br />J^ibbour agreed with Moorse, but he said that Orono is mainly a residential community and he <br />does not think it would be appropriate to have a mtyor thorou^-farc in Sugar Woods. <br />Moorse said it may be possible to have a frontage road concept that is not located directly <br />south of Sugar Woods until it gets west of Sugar Woods and there may be a frontage road in <br />a different spot. He does not feel that the City should give up that option. <br />Flint said he is not in favor of giving up the option of the frontage road. <br />Barrett said there should be a description of a utility easement across the triangle should it <br />become Mr. Otten ’s property. He asked if Mr. Otten would agree to this. <br />(^en said he would want to vacate the existing easement for a new easement. <br />S tephen Pflauro explained the location of the utility easement. <br />Page?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.