My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
02-22-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:36:46 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:33:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
02-19-9D FRI 10:22 FAX 0 007 <br />ORONO CnY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 8,1999 <br />Barrett said that the road agreement is between the developer, Mr. Otten and the City. The <br />City is requesting the agreement in order to open a temporary road. <br />S;msevere asked if Option 3 is a worst^case sc^ <br />B 'Urett said that all of the scenarios involve some reliance on the reasonableness and goodwill <br />oi‘Mn/DOT. Mn/DOT has not agreed to anything in writing. <br />S;insevere asked if there is a fourth contingency. <br />Barrett said he raised that issue, but that would involve the City of Orono condemning <br />Mn/DOT*s land and h would not be feasible. <br />S msevere asked if Option 1 is the most likely scenario. <br />Ciappa said staff is more confident in Option 2. <br />Xtbbcur said he wants the driveway lined up with Brimhall. <br />Kelley said he doesn’t mind the abrupt right turn into the property, but he is concerned about <br />fitture development of Lot 2 and an increase in traffic that would make egress from Service <br />g:K) difficult. He feels there should be an alternate access for Service 800 and more room for <br />stacking of vehicles. Kelley said he favors Option 2, but he wants to keep Option 3 available. <br />J^ibbour said he understands that staff is recommending all three options so that if Option 1 or <br />2 is not feasible, Option 3 would be the faUback option. <br />h loorse said that if Option 1 or 2 is viable, then Option 3 will no longer be available. <br />Kelley stud there could be an agreement with Mr. Otten that if Lot 2 is developed, he would <br />b: willing to review the location of the entrance tu Service 800. <br />Sansevere asked how many cars would be leaving the Service 800 property at one time and <br />v'hether there would be a stacking problem from the developer's standpoint. <br />J<jan Mork Bredeson said there will only be 15 employees and there would probably be three <br />vehicles leaving at one time. <br />Kelley said he wants the Council to think about the development that may happen in 10 or 15 <br />years.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.