My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
02-22-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 1:36:46 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 1:33:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0219'99 FRI 10:23 FAX ©00 ‘9 <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 8,1999 <br />(i(4) H2425 SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS/SERVICE BOO, INC, 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - Continued <br />lUoorsc said that the water and sewer lines are in the triangle and that is where the City wants <br />the easement. <br />B urett said there is an issue of the Long Lake signature. They have agreed informally to <br />c )operate, but there needs to be a formal agreement. <br />Jiibbour said he feels Long Lake will cooperate. <br />Pilaum said that the Long Lake City Council meets on March 4th and they will request Long <br />L:ike’s approval at that meeting. <br />Bsrrett said the Public Works Director recommended in Item 3> where Mr. Otten would grant <br />an easement of 30 feet in width for the right-of-way to the back of the property, the document <br />sliould also reflect a temporary construction easement of 44 feet. <br />Mr. Otten agreed. <br />Flint referred to paragraph 7 of the Road Agreement, the indemnification provision He <br />q uestioned whether the City should agree to that provision of the agreement. <br />Barrett said he agreed that the City should be removed from an indemnification position on <br />tl« agreement. <br />Flint asked which alternative is the preferred option. <br />h loorse said where the staff report says “preferred option”, that is the applicam's preferred <br />ootion. Either Option 1 or Option 2 creates the ability for Service 800 to have the type of <br />access they want. <br />F lint said that cvoi pursuing Option 1 will lengthen the period of time in two regards. It <br />nx)uires Mr. Otten to contact the heirs of Mr. Daniels and Mn/DOT requires a long length of <br />time. He said he favors Option 2 because it can be done in a shorter period of time. <br />Moorse said that Mr. Otten would prefer Option 1 . <br />Pflaum said that Option 1 allows Mr. Otten to acquire fee title to the easement and ultimately <br />eiihances the value of his property. He said that the City does have a lot of what it would like <br />V ithout getting the development of parcel 2 right now. He said the access at Brimhall started <br />b scause it appeared on a City drawing as to a long-term development of the area. By virtue of <br />tiie discussions that have taken place regarding the development of the Brimhall access, any <br />biiycr of Lot 2 will be on notice of Orono’s intention to have a road to the rear of the <br />Pages
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.