Laserfiche WebLink
Outlet A: <br />Outlet A is created as an access outlet for a private driveway to serve Lot 1 and Lot 2. Access <br />catlots are required to be a minimum of 30' wide to accommodate drainage, snow removal and <br />screening without encroaching on neighboring properties. Outlet A is 109' wide and no additional <br />screening is needed. <br />Lot 1 Driveway Wetland Crossing: <br />The existing Lot 4 was created as part of the subdivision of Bill Kelley’s Land in 1977. At that time <br />a flowage and conservation easement was dedicated over the wetlands as shown on the City’s <br />protected wetland maps, except that a 50' corridor on the west side of the property was purposely not <br />included in the easement to allow for future driveway access to the future back lot. The City <br />Engineer at that time approved the legal description, but no comments appear in the application <br />review record regarding this intent. <br />In April, 2000, the Building Official granted applicant a permit to continue the driveway to the back <br />lot. The back lot is accessed off the existing driveway as shown on Exhibit J, and crosses the <br />delineated wetland at a width of 20-30'. It required less than 500 cubic yards of fill, therefore a <br />Conditional Use Permit was not needed. However, the driveway permit may have been issued <br />prematurely, because although the driveway crossing is not subject to the easement conditions, it is <br />still subject to Orono’s wetland ordinances, MCWD and Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) <br />regulations, and this is a DNR-protected wetland. There are some exemptions to the WCA <br />regulations under which this driveway may fall, and this is for the MCWD to determine. <br />While the City would likely not be in a strong legal position to ultimately deny a permit to fill for <br />the purpose of creating access to property, the approval process should be completed. Tlierefore, a <br />condition of preliminary plat approval should be that the City reviews and approves a wetland filling <br />variance, and applicant should be required to provide approvals (or approval waivers) from each of <br />the affected agencies with wetland jurisdiction. <br />Wetlands: <br />As noted above, the existing flowage and conservation easement was dedicated when the underlying <br />property was originally divided off in 1977. The property owner has had the wetlands recently <br />delineated on the property. Current delineation boundaries slightly differ from the original <br />conservation and flowage easement boundaries. The flowage and conservation easement should be <br />amended to reflect the new delineated boundaries. <br />U2594 Jim Johnson <br />2240 Fox Street <br />Class // Subdivision <br />June 19, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br />Easements and Covenants; <br />f y