Laserfiche WebLink
'>:'V <br />-V.i: <br />Jt'v* • Y. <br />•yt <br />gfl-?: <br />•*'Ac- /-fe. <br />1 ii'. o <br />iffi. <br />f-' <br />AiNUTES op -THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1985. PAGE 3 <br />f941~I946“#951 2739 GHADYWOOD RJD. continued <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the question is how <br />to deal with the nor.-conforr.ing use of these properties. <br />Mabusth noted that the City has been aware of the non­ <br />conforming use of these lots since the late 5C's. Mabusth <br />gave a short background as to when these lots were purchased <br />by the applicant.*?'. Mabusth indicated that because the <br />applicants' are non-adjacent property owners creates the <br />illegal non-conforming use, which has been a non-conforming <br />use fer the past 30 years. Mabusth als*^ noted that ro.me of the <br />tracts have been combined and some have not. <br />All three applicants indicated that their request is to be <br />allowed to use the lots for boat dockage. In order to do this, <br />the City must recognize the.m as a legal non-conforming use. <br />Rovegno questioned, since back in 1955 this use was <br />apparently a legal thing to do, at v/hat point did it become an <br />illegal use? <br />Zoning Ad.ministrator Mabusth indicated the cha.nge occurred <br />in 1967, when the formal zoning came in. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth st.etcd that the Planning <br />Commission is bei.ng asked toaddresu two things: 1) recognize <br />these lots a s a legal non-con.f ormit-g use 2 ) grant conditional <br />use per.mits because thase lots have accessory structures <br />with no principal structure. <br />Mr. Ogle stated that issues to be considered are that the <br />applicants' want to change the confoim.ity of the lots, the <br />lots were intended for residents, parking and access <br />probler.s for guests, and the problem with regulating the use <br />and number of boats being docked. <br />A person from the public stated that the LMCD allows one boat <br />per 100 feet of lakeshcrc and the lots in question are 20 foot <br />lots. <br />Tom. Frahm, Chairman of the Marina Committee, stated that the <br />Marina Com.mittee found a problem with the number of boats and <br />ownership of boats. Frahm. stated that the real problem, is <br />that the Marina Co.mmittcc felt they could not deal with the <br />dockage problem without a legal definition of what these <br />pieces of property are, which is why it is before the Planning <br />Co.T.mif Sion. <br />Rovegno wanted to m.ake clear the Planning C ssio.-.' s <br />issues in this natier which is c conditional use permit to <br />allow an. accessory use absent a principal use and variances <br />because the lots arc sub-standarc u.ndcrr the terns cf today's <br />zoning review. Rovugr.c felt that is what probably a <br />reasonable use because it !»as been done for over 30 years. <br />Rovegno questienvd whether tho.se docks have permits from, the <br />I..MCD. <br />•;( V.". - w—.-.K- t • • <br />1 <br />i <br />\ 1 <br />f <br />• 4 <br />* ff <br />f s