Laserfiche WebLink
►r- <br />/V‘- <br />©■^'i <br />l^--v <br />IS <br />?i>::r <br />J » •.*% <br />ll <br />AiNUTES op the planning commission meeting held august 19, 1985. PAGE 3 <br />4941—1946—1951 2739 GHADYViOOD RD. continued <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the question is how <br />to deal with the r.or.-conforr.ing use o£ these properties. <br />Mabusth noted that the Citv has been aware of the non- <br />4. -conforming use of these lots since the late 50's. .Mabus. <br />gave a short background as to when these lots were purchased <br />by the applicants’. Mabusth indicated that because the <br />applicants' are non-adjacent property owners creates the <br />illegal r.on-confcrming use, which has been a non-conforming <br />use fer the past 30 years. Mabusth als'' noted that some of the <br />tracts have been combined and some have not. <br />All three applicants indicated that their request is to be <br />allowed to use the lots for boat dockage. In order to do this, <br />the City must recognize them as a legal non-conforning use. <br />Rovegno questioned, since back in 1955 this use was <br />apparently a legal thing to do, at what point did it become an <br />illegal use? <br />Zoning Ad.m.inistrator Mabusth indicated the change occurred <br />in 1967, when the for.mal zoning came in. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth st.atcd that the Planning <br />Commission is being asked to addresu two things : 1) recognize <br />these lots as a legal non-con.formir-c use 2) grant conditional <br />use per.mits because these lots have accessory structures <br />with no principal structure. <br />Mr. Ogle stated that issues to be considered are that the <br />applicants' want to change the confoim.ity of the lots, the <br />lots were intended for x'esidents, parking a.nd access <br />problems for guests, and the problem with regulating the use <br />and nu.mber of boats being docked. <br />A person from the public stated that the LMCD allows one boat <br />per 100 feet of lakcshcrc and the lots in question are 20 foot <br />lots. <br />Tom. Frahm, Chairman cf the Marina Committee, stated that the <br />Marina Committee found a problem with the number of boats and <br />ownership of boats. Frahm. stated that the real problem, is <br />that the Marina Committee felt they could not deal with the <br />dockage probie.m without a legal definition of what these <br />pieces of property are, which is why it is before the Planning <br />Com.mif sion. <br />Rovegno wanted to m.ake clear the Planning C ,vmissio.n' s <br />issues in this m.atter which is a conditional use permit to <br />allow an. accessory use absent a principal use and variances <br />because the lots are sub-standard under the terms cf today's <br />zoning review. P.ovegr.c felt that is what probably a <br />reasonable use because it Jias been clone for over 30 years. <br />Rovegno questioned whether these docks have permits from, the <br />I.MCD. <br />« <br />I <br />\ Ju <br />■*! • I <br />}i <br />I- - - - - -•• •* ■ .. . . . . ..