Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 24,2000 <br />(^2549 David Lovelace, Continued) <br />barge out to Big Island was discussed, which met with good reception with the neighbors. Lovelace <br />requested assistance from City Staff on the proper process to follow in that regard. <br />Mayor Jabbour noted that the mainland enjoys City garbage collection, while Big Island does not. <br />Jabbour stated he would be willing as a private citizen to provide a site, a rolloff, and a garbage <br />barge on one side of the Island to help clean up Big Island. Jabbour noted that fa.xpaycr dollars <br />cannot be used in this effort. <br />Lovelace commented he was not looking for taxpayer dollars to help clean up the Island but was <br />looking for access to a garbage barge. Lovelace indicated he would be w illing to discuss this <br />further with the Mavor at another time. <br />*(«4) #2559 GILBERT GEHLE, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD - VARIANCES/CUP <br />Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve Variances to Hardcover in the 75-250’ <br />Lakeshore Setback and Hardcover Within 75* of the South Lakeshore, and a Conditional <br />Use Permit to Permit Regrading and Restoration of the Site. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#5) #2563 MIKE AND RUTH FILBRANDT, 3960 BAYSIDE ROAD - SKETCH PLAN <br />REVIEW <br />Mike and Ruth Filbrandt, Applicants, were present. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicants arc requesting a sketch plan review for a 26 acre parcel which <br />consists of three tax parcels The Applicants arc interested in subdividing the properties to create <br />two buildablc lots. The total acreage is approximatelv nine acres of dry biiildabic land, w ith the <br />minimum lot size being five acres in the RR-IA District. <br />This item appeared before the Planning Commission where several issues were discussed <br />relating to how the Applicants could appropriately subdivide the property. The Planning Commission <br />considered subdividing this property by doing a lot line rearrangement: however. City Code may not <br />necessarily apply in this case because they are generally looked at as Class I Subdi\ isions and a <br />Class I Subdivision docs not allow any type of flexible zoning and would require ten acres of dry <br />buildablc land in order to create two lots. Class I Subdivisions requiring flexible zoning have <br />traditionally only been used for lot line rearrangements between existing developed parcels City <br />Citv Code prohibits selling off of the two smaller undeveloped lots without the principal larger lot <br />because it would create two non-conforming lots <br />The Planning Commission had suggested that some consideration be given to rezoning the property from <br />the five acre minimum lot size to two acre minimum lot size. City Staff has brought this <br />matter before the City Council to gi\c their thoughts on whether rezonmg of this area would be