My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
05-08-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 8:53:31 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 8:46:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
oro .no city council meeting <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 24,2000 <br />(#2563 Mike and Ruth Filbrandt, Continued) <br />an option. <br />Kcilcy indicated he would not be in favor of rezoning this property. <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that they would not be in favor of rezoning this area to <br />two acres. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the sketch plan needs to comply with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and <br />that the City cannot rezone areas whenever someone wants to develop their property. <br />Filbrandt stated he bought the two lots in 1979. with the City having passed an ordinance in 1984 <br />stating if the owner purchases a non-conforming lot. they are not able to sell it or get a variance. <br />Filbrandt stated it is his understanding there is approximately 9.5 acres of dr>' buildable. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated the City Council has indicated its position on the rezoning of the land and <br />has not taken a position on the other issues invoU ed w ith the sketch plan. Jabbour noted the City <br />Council has taken the position in the past that an\- rezoning should be addressed in the Comprehensive <br />Plan and that the Comprehensive Plan should bo adhered to as much as possible in an effort to <br />provide for orderK' development. <br />Kelley inquired whether the issue of rezoning was the only reason why this application was sent <br />to the City Council from the Planning Commission. <br />Weinberger indicated City Staff had w anted to get the input of the City Council on the issue of <br />rezoning this property prior to the Applicants filing a prcliminarv’ plat application, due to the Planning <br />Commission's discussions regarding rezoning of the property. <br />Kcilcy stated the City Council has ruled on the rezoning and the matter should now go back before <br />the Planning Commission. <br />Mayor Jabbour concurred the matter should be sent back to the Planning Commission for <br />their review and comment. <br />(#6) #2567 WALFRED PROPERTIES. 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD - COMMERCIAL <br />SITE PLAN REVIEW <br />Tom Rcincn. Project Architect, was present. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant has submitted revised plans showing the removal of the second <br />floor clinic and removal of the underground parking to allow for a one-stor> retail use on the <br />old Grace Baptist site in Navarre <br />The Planning Commission has rev iewed the revised plans and is recommending the zoning code
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.