My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:21:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br />f ■ <br />Mr. Van Eeckhout has revised his plan to not create a lot south of the Creek. This eliminates any <br />concerns of placing hardcover and grading within 75 ’ of a protected waterway. The DNR, Trails and <br />Waterways Unit had requested the developer dedicate a conservation easement along the south <br />boundary of the property. By not developing the southern lot and platting it as a conservation outlot <br />the buffer area between development and tlie Luce Line Trail will be preserved. <br />Sketch Plan <br />The City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed the proposal as part of the Sketch Plan <br />review process. <br />The City Council recommended to the property owner the City of Orono has no intent to rezone the <br />property from the two acre standard. The Council has indicated they would consider developing the <br />site as a PRD and make a provision for sewer. <br />Access <br />The City Engineer has commented (Exhibit G) the proposed access to the property' be platted as part <br />of the subdivision and not by easement. Further, he recommends that the access to the site should <br />meet a minimum 50' width to meet City roadway standards for a public or private street. <br />Drainage and Ponding <br />The draft version of the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan shows that the site lies <br />within the Tanager Lake drainage district. The ponding location is shown on the preliminary surx’ey. <br />Final grading plans should include final pond grading including a 10:1 aquatic bench 10-feet wide <br />at the pond normal water level. The outlet structures shall be provided on the final plans indicating <br />the location and actual size of the pond. The City Engineer w ill require Best Management Practices <br />in all areas where stormwater can not be treated by the NURP pond. <br />Sanitary Sewer <br />A MUSA amendment is required to allow sanitary sewer service to the property. Sewer service has <br />been discussed and a feasibility report has been completed for the Fox Ridge neighborhood south <br />of the Luce Line Trail. The report identified a pressure sew er system as the most feasible to serve <br />the neighborhood. The pressure sewer would be routed up Sou’h Brown Road to an existing gravity <br />sewer on Watertown Road. This system would ha\ e the potential lo serve properties north of Fox <br />Ridge and south of Watertow n Road needing sanitary sewer. <br />The plans show a gravity sewer system that ties into an existing sanitary manhole at the south end <br />of .Apple Glen Road in Long Lake. The proposed alignment as chown would not provide sewer <br />service to properties along South Brown Road. The topography would allow a gravity sewer to be <br />extended westerly in the proposed roadway to South Brown Road to provide future sanitary service. <br />The City and developer had explored the option of extending sewer across the Luce Line Trail and <br />the Longridge Associates property to serve the Fox Ridge neighborhood. After looking at this option <br />it has been detennined this is not the best option to extend sewer to the south to serve the Fox Ridge <br />neighborhood.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.