My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2000
>
02-14-2000 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 4:25:09 PM
Creation date
3/9/2023 4:21:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />• i-' <br />comply with the requirements of the underlying zoning district. The density requirement is 1 <br />dwelling unit per 2 acres. Proposed is 7 lots on 13.7 acres, thus not meeting the density requirements <br />for the RR-IB zoning district. The Planning Commission had recommended the applicant reduce <br />the number of lots to 6 to maintain the required 1 dwelling unit per 2 acre density. <br />Summary of Request <br />The City of Orono has received a Preliminary' Plat application for a seven lot residential development <br />for property located at 120 ^••own Road South. The request would require the following approvals: <br />1. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />A Conditional Use Pennit for a Planned Residential Development -- This would allow the <br />property to develop at a two acre density using cluster development and preservation space. <br />Road width variance and a variance to allow the road to be d^ v^eloped at less than the <br />minimum requirements. Tract G is platted 40' in width where the City requires a minimum <br />platted width for a private residential road to be 50'. Although the plat indicates a 28' paved <br />width the applicant has proposed a 24' width road. The Subdivision Code requires a <br />minimum paved width for property serving 7 or more sites to develop the road at a 28' width. <br />The property is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA). A MUSA <br />amendment shall be approved by the City Council and the Met Council to provide sewer to <br />the site. <br />A small portion of the Tract G is platted to the center of Brown Road. Hennepin County has <br />indicated it would require the west 33' be dedicated to the County for right-of-way. <br />A Homeowner's Association shall be created for the maintenance of the private road and <br />drainage structures within the development. The owner of the 130 Brown Road property', <br />southwest of the development and south of Tract G. has access from the private drivew ay <br />w ithin Tract G and shall become part owner of a private road. <br />Revised Plan <br />The RR-1B zoning district allows a property to develop as a PRD as a conditional use. Under the <br />PRD the City can establish .setbacks for each of the lots. I he dry buildable areas ol lots 1,2,3 and <br />4 arc limited and arc between 1/2 acre to I acre diy buildable. The lots also are similar to the lots <br />located nc'rth of the development in the City of l.ong Lake. The proposed setbacks shown on the site <br />plan indicate a 35' front yard setback. 10' side yard setback and a 30' rear setback. The established <br />setbacks are similar to other lots in Orono that are zoned 1/2 acre to 1 acre in size. <br />The revised plan has maintained the lot arrangement for Block 1. The Planning Commission had <br />requested the lots be platted w ith an average size of about 1 acre, however to maintain the best <br />building sites, and to allow larger lots to the south in Block 2, the lots have remained similar to those <br />lots previously reviewed by the Planning Commission. They are consistent to the development to <br />the north in the City of Long Lake. <br />Block 2 has provided 3 lots with an average size of about 2 acres. The lot originally planned tor <br />wnerc Outlots C and D are located has been eliminated from the plan. Outlots C and D would be <br />platted as conservation outlots. Previously the lot were found to have adequate building sites.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.