My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
10-15-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:44 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:29:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 17,2001 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />(#01-2714 Frederick Puzak, Continued) <br />Weinberger stated the hardcover numbers in the 75-250’ setback would be approximately 35 percent, <br />GalTron stated there is a possibility that once this property is hooked up to City sewer and the <br />adjoining property is no longer needed for septic reasons, that the easement may no longer exist. <br />Puzak stated the easement is "‘ill valid even if his property is hooked up to City sewer. <br />Smith noted a portion of the reduction in hardcover is the result of the removal of plastic. <br />Puzak stated a small portion of the reduction comes from the removal of plastic, with the remaining <br />reduction coming from the driveway being reduced. <br />Mabusth inquired whether the Council would approve new construction within the MUS.A area that is <br />not connected to City sewer. <br />Gaffron stated the City has approved one other similar situation in the mid 1980s on Saga Hill. Tlie <br />Council said if the property owner could prove they had adequate septic, they could proceed w ith <br />development of that lot without hooking up to City sewer. Gaffron stated in this case the sewer line <br />does not abut this property, with the property owner at the present time not having access to the sewer <br />line. Gaffron stated in his view the Applicant faces a hardship by not being able to obtain an easement <br />in order to connect to City sewer. Gaffron stated the City septic inspector would need to review the <br />septic sites. <br />Hawn stated the Planning Commission could table this application in order to allow the septic <br />inspector time to review the septic sites to determine whether they are conforming. <br />Puzak stated he has contacted the City’s septic inspector who indicated he could complete a review of <br />the septic areas prior to the City Council meeting. <br />Gaffron inquired whether the well would be relocated. <br />Puzak stated the well would only need to be moved at which time a second or alternate site would be <br />put into effect. Puzak indicated the well is approximately 25 years old and will probably need to be <br />replaced at about the same time another septic site is needed. <br />Rahn inquired what the current septic system is designed for. <br />Puzak stated the current septic system is serving a five-bedroom house. The proposed site could <br />handle a five-bedroom house. <br />Gaffron stated the City’s septic inspector would need to review the septic sites to determine whether <br />they w ill be allowed. <br />Puzak stated the septic issue would be resolved prior to a building permit being obtained. <br />PAGE 22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.