My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
10-15-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:32:44 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:29:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 17,2001 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />(1^01-2714 Frederick Puzak, Continued) <br />Stoddard indicated he is in favor of this application subject to the septic being reviewed. <br />Hawn noted the Applicant is proposing to meet the IS percent structural coverage, but will still require <br />a hardcover variance given the situation. <br />Lindquist inquired whether there are any bluff issues with this application. <br />Gaffron stated the area near the lake does not rise high enough to be considered a bluff. <br />Stoddard noted the lot does have some hardships inherent to the land. <br />Lindquist stated he would prefer to have the residence hooked up to City sewer if possible and would <br />recommend to the City Council that they review extending the sewer line in this area. Lindquist stated <br />he does not have a problem with the application subject to the sewer issue being reviewed. <br />Rahn inquired when the 1,500 square feet is applied and when the 15 percent is applied. <br />Hawn stated whichever is more. <br />Gaffron stated any lot that is under 10,000 square feet is allowed up to 1,500 square feet structural <br />coverage, with any lot under two acres being allowed 15 percent of the entire lot area. <br />Puzak stated the structural coverage would be at 15 percent. <br />Smith noted the total hardcover does increase by over 500 square feet, with the total structural <br />coverage does increase by over 1,000 square feet. <br />Weinberger stated there arc two sets of hardcover numbers included in the report, with one set <br />being the total hardcover and the other set including the plastic. Weinberger stated the hardcover <br />increases by .2 percent in the 0-75 ’ area and decreases in the 75-250 ’ setback by approximately <br />7 percent. <br />Smith stated the Planner’s Report notes that the total hardcover increases from 1,601 to 2,105 square <br />feet, and the total structural coverage increase on the property is 1,009 square feet. <br />Gaffron stated the total hardcover devoted to structure in the 75-250 ’ area increases, which is different <br />than total hardcover. Gaffron noted the Applicant would be reducing the size of the driveway. <br />Lindquist pointed out the Applicant is proposing structural coverage at 15 percent. <br />Smith stated the existing is 10.3 percent. Smith stated the Applicant is adding additional structural <br />coverage and hardcover. Smith inquired why the hardcover is increasing. <br />Gaffron stated the report says the total hardcover devoted to structure is increasing. <br />PAGE 23 <br />^inar-. •
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.