Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, September 17,2001 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(M)l*2714 Frederick Puzak, Continued) <br />septic sites. A third option would be that the Applicant obtain an easement for municipal sewer <br />connection purposes from the adjacent property owner, which to date he has been unsuccessful in <br />doing. <br />Puzak stated he was able to amend his plan in response to Mr. Weinberger's report and obtain testing <br />which demonstrates two suitable septic sites. <br />Lindquist inquired whether whether they arc located on Lot 31 and are more than 7S feet from the <br />lake. <br />Puzak stated they are on Lot 3 1 and are more than 75 feet from the property. Puzak stated SP Testing <br />did find two septic sites. Puzak indicated lie would be willing to connect up to City sewer when it <br />becomes available. <br />Lindquist inquired whether those two other lots are considered buildable. <br />Puzak stated the propert>' owner of those two lots would like to rezone the property to multi-family <br />and build townhomes on those lots. Puzak stated he is not interested in subsidizing sewer to those two <br />lots and would like to wait until that property owner connects to City sewer. <br />Gaffron stated the City would like to see these properties connected to City sewer if at all possible. <br />Mabusth inquired whether the Cit>’ has a copy of the lease giving the Applicant the rigid to have septic <br />on Lot 3 1. <br />Gaffron stated there are copies of that document in the file. <br />Puzak stated it is actually an easement that he owns. <br />Stoddard stated in his opinion structural coverage should be limited to IS percent. Stoddard requested <br />the building pad be illustrated on the survey. <br />Rahn inquired why both septic sites are on the adjoining property. <br />Puzak stated he has a deeded easement over the adjoining property for septic purposes. Puzak stated <br />he would prefer Option I under Staffs recommendations. Puzak stated he is not requesting a building <br />permit at this time but is requesting variances to proceed forward w ith construction of a new house. <br />Hawn noted the adjoining propert)' could not be built on since it has a deeded easement over it. <br />Puzak stated the old foundation would be entirely removed. Puzak indicated he would like to <br />construct a new residence in order to accommodate his larger family. <br />Hawn inquired if Lot 3 1 is included in the total area, w hat impact that would have on the hardcover <br />numbers. <br />PAGE 21 <br />i