07-16-2001 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINITESOFTHE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ________Moaday, Jane 18.2001________________ Kluth recommended the applicant Murk Mith the City on the parking requirements. («M) W0I-268U RICK WINDENBtRG A SHIRLEY HENDRICKSON. 3200 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCE This application has been M ithdrawn. SCHEDCLED PI BLIC HEARINGS - 7:30 P.M. («9) #0I-26S8 KIRTLAND C. WOODHOUSE. 1780 SHORELINE DRIVE, REARRANGEMENT OF COMMON PROPERTY LINES, 8:13 p.m. - 8:38 p.m. Dob Mitchell. Representative ofKirtland Woodhuuse. and Mike Winton. property oMner. uere present. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication Mere noted. Dottenberg slated tlie Applicants ore proposing a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 1780 Shoreline Drive. The property consists of three separate building lots which were created by Registered Land Surv ev No. 245 in 1953. The three lots w ere separated from the remainder of the land in RLS 245 with the plat ufFoxhill in 1965 Tile cast parcel and middle parcel have residences e.xisting on them. The west parcel is vacant and has been since 1953. Ihc lot line rearrangement is being requested to fulfdt requirements outlined in Resolution «1864 adopted at the time the guest house on the east parcel was granted a conditional use permit in 1985. I he intent of the rearrangement is to create a confonnirig side setback for the e.xisting iiome on the middle parcel and to make the west parcel slightly w ider at the intended building site Dottenberg noted the City *s onsite septic manager has reviewed the septic sites and has detennined bv>th the primary and alternate drainfield sites meet all City and State standards and will not be impacted by the lot line rearrangement. Donenberg stated all three lots currently have access by a private driveway olT Shoreline Drive. This access would remain the same. Tlie driveway is liKated over Tracts E. M. and C of RLS 245. No more than three homes will be served by this driveway. The City would not require upgrade of the driveway to road status unless this was a replal. The survey dives not show any existing easements along interior lot lines which will be moved. Any existing easements should be vacated along areas no longer serv ing as property lines. No new drainage/utility easements are proposed or requested, e.xcept where such easements do exist along lot lines being moved, they should be rededicated along the new lot lines. Dottenberg stated the vacant west parcel is a buildable lot of record, assuming it meets the 200 feel width standard. Width is measured at the front 50 foot setback line, fhe front, rear and side yards need to be established in order for setbacks to be applied to the lot and to confirm where the lot width should be measured. Tlie private curved drive surrounds the west lot on the north, south and west. PAGE 15