Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PI annim; commission meeting <br />Monday, June IB. 2001____________ <br />(#01*2688 Kiiiland Woodhouic, Continued) <br />The east parcel and middle parcel have been developed with the residence oriented towards the lake, <br />with the lake side being considered the front yard and the north being considered the rear property <br />line. To be consistent with the yards of the other two properties, the yards for the vacant west parcel <br />could be defined os follows; <br />- Front - lake side along driveway, beginning at the southern point of the reconfigured west parcel <br />and e.stending northward along the curve to the point where the driveway straightens out. <br />• Rear - north as show n by sun e> or <br />• Side yard - west side along driveway and along east property line adjacent to the middle parcel. <br />• It is questionable whether the west side lot line adjacent to the driveway should be treated as a <br />side street. Staff recommends that it be simply a side lot line. <br />noitcnberg noted only the east parcel will have lake access. <br />StalT is recommending approval of tlie lot line rearrangement as proposed on the suney based on the <br />follow ing conditions; <br />1. The City accepts yard setback demarcation as shown on the suney and neither lot width nor <br />setback variances will be needed to build on the west lot. <br />2. Tlte applicant shall grant drainage and utility casements, to replace any such existing easements <br />which no longer follow lot lines. <br />Winton stated he dt»es not have any additional comments to Staff s report. <br />Kurt Ket/ler. I lOU Heritage Lane, expnrssed concents regarding hcadliglus from the tralTic on the <br />driveway coming into their a*sidences. <br />Hawn stated the applicant will need to meet all the code requirements. <br />Ciaffron stated there is a 30 fixit required setback, with the closest the home could be constructed <br />being 50 feet from the lot line. Gaffron stated the lot line rearrangement does meet the City *s <br />standards. <br />Lindquist stated as long as the ci>nstriKfion of the house meets the standards of the City, they can <br />build accordingly <br />Melanie Hessner. 1190 Heritage Lane, stated she has lived in this area for seven years and has some <br />concents regarding increased traffic if another residence is built in this area. Flessner stated the <br />private driveway serves three homes and she would like to see some vegetation or screening along the <br />roadway to limit the impact of the headlights flashing into their residences. Flessner expressed <br />concerns that a much larger home than what currently exists in the ncighborhcKHl will be built <br />Hawn stated the house must meet all code setbacks and other requirements, with the height being <br />restricted to 30 feeL