02-19-2002 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MIM TKS OK TIIK ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:30 o’clock p.m. Hawn inquired whether any members of the Planning Commission had an\ issues with the setback Kluth stated the City of Orono has the responsibility to insure that there is a correct mitigation plan in place fo*' those wetlands Mabusth inquired whether there is any benefit to make Lot 2 an outlot Gaffron stated it would be city-owtied property , noting Lot 2 is considered a buildable lot Gaffron slated if It IS made an outlot. there would need be conditions put on its uses Gaffron stated he is unsure whether there is any benefit that would be derived by making it an outlot Haw n suggested three separate motions be made on each of the items for consideration Smith moved, Kluth seconded, to recommend approval of the tw o-lot plat subject to MCWD wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan approval, subject to the Orono City Council determining whether any impact fees such as park dedication/fees and stormwater trunk fees are applicable. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Kluth moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of the side street setback to allow a 40’ side street setback where 50’ would normally be required based on the hardships outlined in the February 15, 2002 Staff Report, with the condition that if the sixth bay is not constructed, the variance will nut be used for any other purpose. Gaflron inquired what would happen if they decide to expand in the future, noting the variance is onlv good for one y car Kluth staled they could ask for a renewal Kluth noted they currently only have four bay s Kluth stated the motion restricts what tlie variance can be u.sed for Jabbour eommented the building committee kK'ked at numerous way s to avoid the need for a variance for a sixth bav but were unsuccessful I»A(;K 24