My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO puannint ; ( OMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February- 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Kluth inquired if there is an agreement on the aneillary uses, how that would be enforced <br />Jabbour stated there could be a crxlc amendment relating to mumeipal facilities <br />Klutli inquired whetlicr the City of Long Lake has agreed to tiiose restrictions on its use <br />Jabbour slated originally the building was expected to be constructed m downtown I.ong Lake, and little <br />by little the project mo\cd into the City of Orono Jabbour stated the committee in his uew understands <br />what tile intent of the building is. and that the neighbors need to understand what this project entails and <br />the impact that it will ha\e on their neighborluxxl <br />Kluth expressed concern that if tliere is no formal agreement on what type of uses this building can be <br />used for. there may be problems in the future that could dramatically change the character of the <br />neighborhocxl <br />Jabbour stated in Ins opinion the two cities should enter into a more formal agreement regarding the use <br />of the building, and recommended the City of Orono consider adopting ordinances encompassing am <br />municipal building <br />Kluth stated m his view there should be a formal agreement m writing that perhaps runs with the land, <br />such as a restrictsc covenant on the land restricting its use <br />Mabusth noted the building is kxated w ithin the City of Orono and would therefore be subject to <br />Orono's rules and regulations Mabusth stated the City of Orono has strict regulations eonc>.'Ming liquor <br />consuinplion. cl cetera <br />Jabbour stated he is not suggesting that there will be large amounts of liquor on the property <br />Kluth stated m his view the two couneils and building committee will need to develop some type of <br />agreement restricting the types of uses for this facility <br />Hawn stated she would like to have the Planning Commission vote on each of the three issues before <br />them tonight separately. and then discuss the use of this building or any other matter that mav arise and <br />make the appropriate recommendations to the Council <br />PA(;E 23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.