My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINI TKS OF TMK <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Carter indicated they did discuss that with the MCWD, who had also suggested the garage be Icx'ated <br />closer to the liousc Carter stated the\ originally located the garage 20 feet from the house and ha\c <br />since relocated it si\ feet closer Carter stated the problem with coming any closer to the house with the <br />garage is access into the garage <br />Smitli inquired whetlier the garage doors could be relcKated <br />Carter slated it is a tuck-under garage, which limits which direction the garage can be accessed from <br />Kluth commented the hardships are ver> compelling in this case, but noted that there is nothing m the <br />lay of the land that requires a two le\ el garage Kluth staled he is unsure what the hardship is for a two <br />level garage <br />Peterson stated he did not want to construct a single le\el four car garage, which would add to the <br />hardco\cr Peterson stated the garage was stacked in an clTort to limit the footprint <br />Ftalin inquired whether tins design was completed prior to the new zoning requirements were put into <br />place <br />Peterson stated at the time tJicy purchased the property. the\ understood there was a \ery definite spot <br />for the he >se. and they designed the house to meet that specific building pad Peterson stated in <br />December the issue with the builcimg pad came up. which reauced the size of the building pad b\ <br />approximatch one-third Peterson stated they attempted to relcKate the house, but the situation with tlie <br />sanitary sewer did not allow them to relocate the house very far <br />Kalin stated in his v iew the garage could possibly be relocated out of the wetland area if the garage were <br />redesigned and attached to the home <br />Peterson stated the garage was stacked to lessen the footprint Peterson stated due to the ele\ atums of <br />the land, the garage was located slightly away from the house <br />Kahn stated m his view a four-car garage is not a necessity <br />PAGE 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.