My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />1 uesday, February 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />having water draining directly towards the street I'he propertN is IcKated at a low point where water <br />can reach cIc\ation where it will cross llie street Wildhursl Frail also docs not ha\c storm water drains <br />or curb and gutter Weinberger stated a nuiliial agreement was reached with the NKAVD that allow- for <br />only a minimum amount of nmoITto get to the street, w ith the remainder of the runoO'be:ng directed to <br />a ditch area along Wildhurst Trail and then olTinto the mitigated area of the v .llands Fhis w ill allow <br />the water to cross over as much land as possible before impacting the existing wetlands and lake <br />llie Cit\ Engineer is recommending that the foundation of the building be located 15 feet from the <br />actual sewer line, which creates a situation requiring the house to be located further to the north and <br />caused a ponioa of the garage to be located into the wetland area <br />Staff* recommends approval of the application based on the five hardships outlined in Staff’s report <br />Peterson stated he has nothing additional to add to Staffs report <br />'ITcre were no public comments itlalmg to this application <br />Hawn inquired what thoughts the Planning Commission had regarding access from Wildliursl <br />Kluth inquired why two curb cuts rather than one <br />Peterson staled two curb cuts make access to the propertv work the best Peterson noted under <br />Item ^4 the Cit> is going to review that item <br />Hawn inquired whether the Applicant would be okav with this application puKceding fonvard subject to <br />that condition <br />Peterson stated that would be okay <br />Kluth staled it was his understanding a property owner was onlv allowed one curb cut <br />Weinberger staled traditionally onlv one access is granted to a propertv. with each request being <br />reviewed bv the Public Works Director Weinberger stated it has been the policy of the Citv m the past <br />to only allow one curb cut. noting it might not be defined specifieallv m the axie <br />Smith inquired whether the garage could be located closer to the house to ehminale the need to be <br />within the wetland <br />PAGE I3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.