My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1979
>
01-08-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:38:05 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:37:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />M, Upda^I^l^ Oim Store Water Management Plan, Coqirehensive Land Use Plan, <br />Comp. Zoning Code and other policies of Orono in this area. <br />35, Stement should reflet the total inconsistency pertaining to urbanization and the <br />desire to protect Lake Mtka with the Orono Comp. Land Use pianT^ <br />36. Update to reflect current Metro Coincil policy statements. <br />poucies of the Metro Comcil do not <br />“cowistent with thefeoro bnd \J^e flan of Orono and it is <br />the use of this interceptor necessary in the <br />ju***• in relation to the adverse effects store water niioff <br />.installation of sewers in this area should be contrary to Metro Coincil policy. <br />^hf consis;^t with the peoposed routing and construction of <br />ti^ ^gwgoaed intorreptor. There are other alternatives that could be more consis wi^n uiis stKciftcnt. <br />Final plans and specifications have not been provided to the LMCD at this time. <br />40. This statomltit should be enlarged to indicate the potential envirommntal damiee <br />fo lake mtka from store water nnoff of urbanized areas. <br />t^^ly ^rrect the interceptor design does most definitely <br />defanirely conflict wito O.Coi^ Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinances. <br />42. It is ^ present feeling of Orono that the public interest .is not serv^ with the <br />presTOt desipa of the proposed interceptor, which would beS&tft]ttl’^^ue a <br />variance to Ord 12S^ the Wetlands Protective Ordinance. <br />pere are oper alternatives in xuMUna the interceptor that would serve the public <br />intorep and not require a variance3W?'T25. because they would not traverse our wetlands areas. <br />theO?. ^ Sld*uS*Plm revieed and updated to be consistent with <br />39. <br />**' w«tn^ liM <br />e V of 0. <br />45. <br />^ina that pre^t&a present problem is the Edina - Morningside deviAon which <br />***j s®* other means than to force urbanization of the retire Orono <br />iSf J*®"**^*^*-®**® of tte Lake Mtka watershed creating irreversible dreage to lake Mtka because of the increased urbanization. <br />47. Statremt is totally untrue. Orono has successfully used on-site septic systeis <br />!S «cw lot developnrets for many years. It should be expanded to ^ow <br />that Orono has rezoned all uisewered areas to a mi^iiui IT lot size of two acres. <br />48. Staterent not trre. Pullic services required by increased ubranization created <br />by the propo^ interceptor are not available.^ Hig^ay 12 upgrading project <br />is at least 20-25 ydars away . The Heim. Co. ^jn8%*tel^ISportati« ^ign <br />Limitation precludes OrreoM providing additional services in the areas of Police, Fire, Water, and <br />other mmicipally provided services.required by increased urbanization.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.