My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1979
>
01-08-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:38:05 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:37:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
49. <br />50. <br />51. <br />This stat^t is to^ly untrue, and should be modified to indicate that becuase <br />of Metro C^il policy md Orono ’s legal obligations to provide sewer service <br />when possible that the interceptor will iiiaf dictate iKreased urbanization <br />to use the metro interceptor capacity once the line has been installed. <br />Statoent is not dm consistemt with Orono Land Use Plan. <br />If urbniattion does occur in Orono it will be because of the Existence of the <br />^rposed interceptor and metro Council Policy inconsistent with Orono's cobb <br />pl*** » This statement should be gre»atly expanded to show the long <br />*to*la5'mtka"**^^* caused by urbanization, thru storm water pollution <br />Ti? ^ relatiowhip to the original intent of the interceptorbtrt^n ^ totally negated by the proposed route and specification of the <br />proposed interceptor mtsh which will cause ecocological secondary damse as a <br />result of the increased urbanization. * <br />Hackberpr Hill nm presently sewerd and no longer an existing problem. There must <br />be other solMions to the Medina Moringside Subdivision rather iJun the present <br />proposal of interceptors having an adverse secondary effect on Mtka. <br />French Lake does have homes located on the lake . <br />evidence that indicates that this potential does not exist. <br />56. Statmt of an environmental trade-off but does not address itself to which <br />m^od IS to be in the construction of the interceptor. This further should <br />**P**"*® include the potential managenmnt problem of me supervising an <br />rouepeyient contractor who has most likely provided the low bid from making an <br />irrepairable mistake preventing the marsh from being returned to its matural state <br />57. Tl^ statement is not justified ind Orono has grave concerns that the existence of <br />♦J generally reverse the quality of groimd water discharge^ atM within the interceptor service ere&» <br />58. Stat^nt is untrue. Orono has successfully used on-site systems within the Village <br />« two aw size lots for many years. Present zoning ordinances require two aezx <br />miniMM lot size for all tmmnn unsewered portions of the Village. <br />59. This statemt expresses a major concern and should be expanded to reflect <br />tw potential mx for ai irreversible laistake tm that could prevent the marsh <br />from being returned to its natural state. This major envinxmmntal concern has <br />been given an extremely light treatment by this statement. <br />eentaiirti.. ■■In II h—, i... ------------------ „„ ........ ....... <br />The Hacl^ny Paiic has been updated xecreational equipnnet since Hackbeny Sewer <br />Project has been completed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.