Laserfiche WebLink
!■ <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 7, 1979 <br />Page 2 <br />a CHE <br />rtown Road <br />)N <br />:o. Meeting <br />- 7:40 P.M <br />ERRY <br />«? Dr. So. <br />PERMIT <br />mu <br />Mr. Petersen and Mrs. Olson were present. The plan <br />now reflects the road being moved to the center of <br />the peninsula. No variances are needed for the two <br />new building sites. The existing cabin and garage <br />(Lot 3) will be removed. Due to the lake being <br />shallow on the south side, the possibility of creating <br />an outlet on the northeast side for lake access for <br />Lot 3 was discussed. If this was done, there would <br />be no access allowed for Lot 3 on the south shore. <br />Hammerel moved to approve the subdivision conditioned <br />upon: <br />1. Public road graveled to City standards. <br />2. Approval of three new sewer units. <br />3. Shed and garage on Lot 3 to be removed. <br />4. Lots 2 6e 3 will not be permitted setback <br />variances for construction. <br />5. Payment of Park Dedication Fee on the two new <br />building lots. <br />6. Creation of Outlot B for lake access for Lot 3 <br />on the northeast shore due to the shallowness <br />of the lake on the south with the condition <br />that no access for Lot 3 will be permitted on <br />the south shore. <br />Motion seconded by Adams. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />GARY PETERSEN <br />1340 Baldur Park Rd. <br />SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE <br />(#466) <br />’•A. t' <br />" .US-: <br />m <br />MR <br />Mr, Touve was present. Also present were Ih:. and <br />Mrs. Walter Hoyle, 4198 North Shore Drive, who were <br />opposed to the proposal. Their contention was the <br />garage could be built on the other side of the house <br />without any need for a variance, therefore, this <br />request should be denied. Mr. Touve stated that <br />Hennepin County Highway Department was reluctant to <br />give another access to County Road 19 and preferred <br />that the existing access continue to be used, <br />however, if the variance was denied by the City, <br />they would consider the access request. Alternatives <br />such as moving the garage back 15' or building it on <br />the other side of the house with a driveway across <br />the front yard to the existing access or directly to <br />County Road 19 were discussed. Because the consensus <br />of the Planning Commission was that there were <br />alternatives to the proposal and perhaps the applicant <br />and the Hoyles could reach a compromise, this item was <br />tabled until later in the meeting so they could consider <br />t-he alternatives- <br />JAMES TOUVE <br />4196 North Shore Dr. <br />VARIANCE <br />(#476)