My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-01-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
02-01-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:55:59 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:55:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />i <br />■ <br />‘ <br />L <br />#671 Schlee Builders <br />Page 2 <br />Sketch Plan Review <br />Bacause the Tonka property is included, the proposal now encompases <br />the large wetlands on that property. That area was the subject <br />of a detailed flood plain analysis as part of the 1978 Flood <br />Insurance Study/Floodplain Ordinance adoption. The regulatory <br />floodplain elevation of the marsh is 936.0* MSL. ISSUE: The <br />engineer has only shown a 934 elevation. The 936 elevation must <br />be used for flowage and conservation easement purposes, and a 26* <br />construction/alteration setback is required. This eliminates Lots <br />1 and 2, Block 1 as dra%m. The benefit of including this marsh in <br />the plat is the available wetlands density credits, and the pos <br />sibility of using the flood control area as part of the required <br />site retention pond. Full drainage plans will be required including <br />additional ponding volume required (may raise the 936 elevation). <br />Skimming devises, and outflow control devices. <br />THE MAJOR ISSUE OF THIS PROPOSAL IS DENSITY. The zoning is LR-lC-1, <br />2 units per acre increasable to 3 units with a PRD. Because the <br />property is sewered. Section 31.841c allows use of the floodplain <br />area as density credit, provided the amount of wetlands area used <br />as a credit does not exceed the dry land area (it won't; so this <br />means in-effect that the wetlands area can be added to the net dry <br />buildable area to arrive at allowable total density). Note however, <br />that LR-lC-1 Section 34.621(g) specifically references 37.015, <br />which in turn limits the result from all forms of density credit to <br />not more than 4 units per acre of dry buildable ground. <br />The previous applications approved for Schlee were 24 units on <br />9.2613 acres; 2.5914 units per acre gross density; 3.1462 units <br />per acre net density (excluding street right of way). <br />The current application indicates 60 units on 19.08 acres, or 3.14 <br />units per acre gross (not net) density. No figure is given for <br />street right of way. As proposed, it appears likely that the net <br />density would exceed 4 units per acre in violation of 37.015, and <br />far in excess of the 3.0 acre net density of the LR-lC-1 district. <br />The 60 unit figure was obtained by adding the 24 units previously <br />approved for the theater to 36 units on the Tonka property. The <br />36 unit figure was contained in the 1976 agreement between the <br />City and appellants to the 1974 rezoning. See stipulation attached. <br />He have not received detailed area calculations for the Tonka <br />property. Our records indicate about 9.37 acres total including <br />3.41 acres of marsh and 5.96 acres dry. Using these figures and <br />the LR-lC-1 PRD density, 1 calculate: <br />dry land: 6 acres x 3 > 18 units <br />wet credit: 3.4 acres x 3 > 10.2 units <br />TOTAL « 28 units; not 36 <br />i <br />I <br />- <br />4 <br />stdlftai
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.