Laserfiche WebLink
MIMJTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 16, 1977 - PAGE 4 <br />Jerry McCallum and Kurt Henrickson, representing the applicant, <br />presented a newly executed purchase agreement for adjacent <br />Q|U>ts 6 and 7. They agreed to conbine all five lots (6-10) <br />^*^into one building site granting an easement to Lucille Olson <br />of 4784 North 9iore Drive. <br />VIRGIL DOERFLER <br />4799 TONKA VIEW <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA <br />(#249) <br />The Planning Conmission conmended the applicant for their <br />cooperation and con^liance. <br />Pesek moved, McDonald seconded, to reconmend approval of <br />any lot area variance conditioned on the conbination of <br />Ix)te _6-10 mto one building site and provided the proposed <br />that thebuilding will meet all setback requirements, and <br />applicant grant and access easement to Lucille Olson at <br />4784 North Shore Drive. Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />A1 Olson stated that he had received no further word from <br />the applicant. The ^airman asked if there was a repre­ <br />sentative for Mr*. Gullickson present. A party sto^ and <br />informed the COnmission that he was speaking as a <br />friend of Mr. Gullickson*s who had asxed him to tell the <br />Comnission that additional land could not be purchased. <br />The Conmission discussed this information and decided <br />tlwt they had some questions to ask of the applicant <br />himself. Hannah moved, Guthrie seconded, to table this <br />matter until Mr. Gullickson was present. Motion - <br />Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Mr. Rud and his attorney Roy Haglund were present. <br />Applicant is current owner of four lots (Lots 3 8 4, <br />Block 1, and Lots 3 8 4, Block 4). These four lots <br />conbined slightly exceed-one acre for one building site. <br />Applicantrds requesting to use his .property as two <br />building sites.' Mr.'purchased-this property with — <br />the understanding that there ivere two building sites. <br />Lots are:^ cannon ownership but-4hey:are-assessed <br />for two houses. Applic^t stated that the Council - <br />grated a variance three years ago to allow for two <br />building sites. <br />After some discussion, Pesek moved, Hosfield seconded, <br />to reconmend denial of variance to build on either <br />parcel. The availability of conmonly owned, adjacent <br />land would mean that granting of the variance request <br />would be, in effect, granting of a non-conforming, <br />substandard lot division. Conmission also recoimended <br />waiving $2,388 of unpaid sewer assessments if all four <br />lots (2 parcels) are combined as one building site <br />meeting the zoning requirements, ffotion - Ayes (5), <br />Nays (0). <br />r <br />1 <br />JOHN GULLICKSON <br />920 FOREST ARMS LANE <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA <br />(#250) <br />'i-* <br />fv*'ft <br />n <br />T. KENNETH RUD <br />4735 TONKA VIEW <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA 8 WIDIH <br />(#253) <br />I