Laserfiche WebLink
k-» <br />MINlfTES OF A PLANNING OOMISSICN ^ffiE^ING HELD MAY 16, 1977 - PAGE 3 <br />♦ <br />‘Don Sjostran, Tepresenting Mr. Khite viho owns property just <br />north and east of this proposed subdivision, was present. <br />JJe was wondering if the applicant was requesting sq;)proval <br />#^o dredge. The Commission infoimed him that the only <br />^dredging that they would have a right to request would be <br />maintma^ dredging in the existing 30* channel assuming <br />that it is part of the lake and assuming that it was <br />legally dredged before. Mr. Sjostrom also stated that his <br />client prefers to keep the dock away from the channel <br />because he feels that it would be one more step to get <br />that channel deemed part of the lake. <br />After all oomnents were received from the floor, the <br />Planning Coninissian discussed this proposal. They were <br />not in favor of the entire walkway extending alongside <br />the diannel vhich they thou^t would lead to docking and <br />general congestion. However, they suggested that it <br />wtiild be more acceptable to have no more than 50 feet of <br />loading dock on the channel if the remainder of the walk< <br />way was setbadc at least 10 feet from the channel edge, <br />^iplicant agreed with this suggestion. <br />Pesdc moved, Guthrie seconded, to reconmend approval of <br />this joint use dock and walkway going to the channel <br />subject to the following: <br />1.Six slips with a provision that they become seven <br />at such time that Outlot A were to be conbined <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />with the existing 1-acre lot and that access to <br />those slips by via a walkway from the siibdivision <br />to the chumel. <br />Access to the dock would be by walkwi^r throu^ the <br />marsh directly to the diannel. Maxinum 50* section <br />of walkway could be located on the channel to serve <br />as a loading area only, beyond whidi the walkway <br />should jog back at least 10 ft. from the edge of <br />the diannel to avoid congestion. <br />Loading area is not for permanent moorings <br />There is no deteimination of die channel <br />navigability. <br />Loading area is for the applicant's convenience <br />only without granting any permanent right of <br />access (dredging) to the loading area. <br />Subject to standards of LMGD and MCWD. <br />Granting a variance to our wetlands ordinance for <br />construction of the dock. <br />Subject to joint dock use regulations. <br />Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />VICTORIA GRAIN COMPANY <br />(Continued)- <br />(#200) <br />- j <br />i <br />y <br />mmwimmsM <br />vV <br />i