Laserfiche WebLink
t'm m <br />PLANNNING OOtflSSIQN MEETING ICU> MMT 17, 1976 • Page 3 <br />accessory structures and lot line setbadcs for stables. <br />Van Nest moved, Guthrie seconded to reconnnend approval of <br />the Conditional Use Permit to keep horses on the property <br />as the proposal does not conflict with conc^ts set forth <br />in our Land U^e Plan and to approve the variance for the <br />accessory building GMim) without a main structure as <br />this parcel is directly across from Roessel's existing <br />residence with future j^lans of building a new residence <br />on this same lot. Also to approve the variance from the <br />lot line setback requirement as the proposed location <br />would meet all minimum setbadcs from adjoining proper- <br />ties and Watertown Road would provide adequate setback <br />from the property across the street. Motion, Ayes (5) - <br />Nays (0). <br />Mr. Lani>in presented his new plans for the Burger King <br />proposal. These included an approach from Goisity Road <br />#19 located north of the power pole through an agreement <br />Tdth the church. The following changes were noted on the <br />new plans: <br />1) Ingress and egress from Couity Road #19. <br />Ingress only from County Road #15. <br />Moving the northeast pr^rty line toward the south <br />west to the top of the hi^ ground to permit re zon­ <br />ing of the lower elevations from B-1 to LR-IC. <br />No filling of low areas. <br />60 parking spaces. <br />"Enter Only" sign on Couity Road #15. <br />Utilizing of vacated Navarre Lane as part of ap­ <br />proach and diurdi parking. <br />2) <br />3) <br />4) <br />5) <br />6) <br />7) <br />brad Van Nest informed the Comnission that he had attended <br />a recent Miimetonka Beadi Couicil Meeting with regard to <br />their view on this request. They showed some concern about <br />traffic generation, lighting and litter along lafayette Bay <br />and possible grease problems. <br />Mr. Laniiin explained he had removed the drive-in, take-out <br />concept of the establishment to minimize the litter possi­ <br />bility and that grease was not a major problem with Burger <br />King as most of the service is done on throw-away dishes. <br />Pesek moved, Guthrie seconded to recoamend conceptual ap­ <br />proval subject to adequate landscaping from residential <br />areas in Minnetonka Beadi and Orono, resolving grease ques­ <br />tions through referral to City Engineer, ingress and e^ss <br />approach from County Road #19 to be located north of the <br />power pole, ingress only from County Road #15, and moving <br />t'le zoning line and prt^rty line to the southwest. Motion, <br />Ayes (3) - Nays (2) Van Nest and McDonald. <br />After approval of the concept Mr. Gene Block voiced some <br />objection because of the possibility of consumer traffic <br />through the residential streets. <br />ROBERT RDESSEL <br />Cont. <br />BUnZR KING <br />3340 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />iITIONAL USEMM, <br />J