My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS COM>nSSION MEETING <br />Taesdiy, September 4,2001 <br />c <br />% <br />overlooked. Wolfe expressed concerns that in the future other groups will bring in other <br />classifications that they would like adopted. <br />nse commented it was her understanding that the Park Commission was discussing the concept of <br />adopting a **natural classification'* in genera) and not specifically to Forest Lake Landmg. <br />McDermott stated the discussion concerning a ‘‘natural classification** is general and that the Park <br />Commission may want to revisit the sites classified as a Class V to determine whether they should <br />be classified as a natural area also. McDermott noted the Council had directed the Park <br />Conunission to come up with a set of classifications for the various access points. <br />Meyers stated in his view the topography of the area should dicute whether the area is classified as <br />a nrtural area rather than politics. Meyers stated it would be up to the discretion of the Council <br />whether they wish to change the classifications in the future depending on the changing <br />circumstances of the area. <br />McDermott moved, Meyers seconded, to create a Oass V% “Naturar Lakesbore Access <br />Site, which would include naturaltzatlon of the shoreline for sites deemed appropriate for <br />restoration to the natural habitat of the area, pedestrian access to the area, nsbing from <br />the shoreline, with boating not being allowed. <br />Wolfe stated the Park Conunission wants to encourage the local residents to de\-elop the shorelines <br />naturally. <br />Meyers stated in His opinion if a resident comes up with an idea for a different classification, the <br />Park Commission should consider it Meyers suted in his \iew an additional classification of <br />natural area with pedestrian access would be beneficial. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Meyers, Bouchard, McDermott; Nays 4, Use, SUber, Wolfe, Ilalvorsoo. <br />MOTION FAILED. <br />Use indicated she would be w tiling to reconsider this classification in the future. <br />(Recess was taken from 9:20 p.m. - 9:30 p.m.) <br />It was the consensus of the Park Commission to classify Forest Lake Landing as a Class 1 based <br />upon the historical use of the site. <br />Bse noted the Park Commission did receive a request from some of the residents in this area for <br />pedestrian access to the water. Use ir. {Uired where the markers would be placed at this particular <br />site. <br />McDermott stated it is his understanding the Park Commission had agreed to place the flush <br />markers at the four comers of all lake access points, with discussion still to be had on where to <br />place the upnght markers at each particular site. The Park Commission had discussed at their <br />previous meeting the option of placing some upright markers within the use area at some of die <br />lake access sites. McDermott encouraged the members of the Park Commission to gisT some <br />thought to a uniform method for placement of the upright markers. <br />PAGE 9 <br />n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.