My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLNUTESOFTHE <br />ORONO PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS CO>DnSSION MEETLNG <br />Tnesday, Sq»tcmb(r 4,2001 <br />McDcnnott concurred that the Park Commission would need a diagram of what the area would <br />look like prior to turning this site into a natural area. McDermott stated in his opinion <br />approximately 40 to 50 feet of the lakeshoce would be restored, with the remaining 20 feet left as is. <br />Wolfe agreed that this is an intriguing concept, but questioned whether this is beyond the scope of <br />what the Park Commission has been directed to do. Wolfe stated in his opinion there might be <br />belter sites within the City for an ecosystem restoration and that the Park Commission needs to <br />address what type of access should be allowed at this site. <br />McDermott stated in his view if swimming is not allowed and there is just basically a pathway <br />down to the lake, this access point wnll not become heavily used. <br />Meyers questioned whether the Park Commission should even classify this as a Class 1*A, noting <br />that the e.xact language for this classification has not been finalized. <br />McDermott stated the Park Commission needs to determine what type of classification they want to <br />give to this site. McDermott indicated the Council would be holding a public hearing on this matter <br />probably in September, with the Council voting on the recommended classifications. A Class I-A <br />classification could include language that this is a natural area that is being developed for an <br />ecosystem based approach for filtering drainage before it enters the water based upon the <br />recommendations of the DNR. <br />fise stated she has heard some of the residents say they are not opposed to having the neighbors <br />have access at this time, with swimming not being recommended, and fishing not being preferred. <br />Ilse suted perhaps the Park Commission needs to consider those types of issues first and w hat the <br />City would like to see this access point used for. <br />McDermott stated the first question in his opinion for the Park Commission is whether they want to <br />adopt a classification called a natural area. <br />Bouchard indicated she would be willing to adopt a classification for a natural area, but that she <br />would like to see pedestrian access left available. <br />Meyers stated there could be an observation trail or lookout area constructed which would allow <br />access close to the lakeshore. <br />McDermott stated in his view the Park Commission is not in favnr of fencing this access point off <br />toully. <br />Bouchard indicated she is not in favor of adopting a classification for a natural area if the public is <br />not allowed to have access to iL <br />McDermott and Meyers indicated they agree with Bouchard. Meyers stated if this area is turned <br />into a natural area, swimming, boating, and fishing probably would not be allow*ed, w'hich would be <br />included in the classification language. <br />Wolfe stated in his view adding the “natural classification** may be premature at this time. Wolfe <br />stated people have been using this access point for the past 40 to 30 years, which cannot be <br />PAGES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.