09-15-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L FiIE»C3-2*49 8«pt*me#f 10 2003 Paot4afS 2. "The plight of the landouner is due to circumstances unique to his proDem* not created by the landov^ner.” In tht opinion of staff this criterion is met. y The vanance. if granted, wilt not alter the essential character of the localits .* The proj^sed addition will not affect the vieu s of the lake enjoyed by adjacent properties In the opinion of staff this criterion is met 4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter" The applicant has not indicate J economic considerations as a factor h the opinion of staff this criterion is met 5, -Undue h^hip also includes, but is not limited to. inadequate access to direct sunhjht for solar energy ssitems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Section I I6J.06. Suhd 2 when in harmony with this Chapter." ’ X/A 6. ‘The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council mav not permit as a :™?rred“!r“^ In the opinion of staff this criterion is met 7. The Board or Council may permit as a . the temporars use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 8. -The s^-ial eondiuons applying to the structure or land in question ate pcculiai to such property or immediately adjoining property ." The property is situated on a peninsula nith lake on the north and east sides additionally almost halfof the lot area is located within the 0-75 * setback -one In the opinion of staff this criterion is met * ' ’ XTs^d'i^d fs'’S'’-'' ■" The property,, afmnsula and the existing home is entirely uithm the merage