Laserfiche WebLink
FiLEi03-2«49 <br />10 20w3 <br />Pag«3of5 <br />H^pdcovcr CalcuhitiQBs; <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />.Allowed 1 <br />Hardcover <br />Exbling <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Haid cover <br />0-75 35,961 s.f.Os.f ! <br />t0%) 1 <br />1 <br />3.273 s.f <br />(9.10%) .No <br />Chance <br />, 3.273 s.f <br />; (9.10%) No <br />‘ Chance <br />75-250 29.551 $.f. <br />i <br />1 <br />7.587.7 s.f. i <br />i25%) <br />1 8.750 s.f <br />(29.0%) No <br />Chance <br />8.750 s.f <br />(290«.i,)No <br />Chance <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plasiic-lineJ landscape beds <br />Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br />The property is situated on a peninsula. %\hich places the existing residence entirely <br />within the average lakeshore sct^'ack. Due to the nature of the property it is both <br />implausible to meet the average lakeshore setback and to block the views of the lake from <br />the adjacent properties. The applicani’s are proposing a 2"^ story addition above existing <br />living space. <br />Hardship SlalcmeBi <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in txhibii B. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />/« conilJerlng mpptlcatioHt for ytarlAnct. the Planning Conunistlon %hall coniiJer the ejject of the <br />ffopoud roriente upon the heobh. safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, tight and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property In the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code In instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unl4fue to the individual <br />ptapifty under consideration, and shall recommend approsal only when It Is demonstrated Aat suck <br />aertoms wUI be In keeping wbh the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code.___________________ <br />Staff finds that the applicant's proposal would not further restrict the views from the <br />neighboring properties than that of the existing home, and a hardship exists due to the <br />nature of the property being a penin' -la <br />Staff w ould make the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue <br />hardship" pertinent to this application: <br />1. "The properly in question ca.-j'.oi be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the ofllcial controls." <br />The propern is localeti on a peninsuta with ahnosi half of the area w ithm ihe 0-75 <br />zone In (he opinion of staff this criterion is met <br />i____