Laserfiche WebLink
r- <br />FLEIOMM <br />to 2003 <br />PaOtSoTS <br />II. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the Irttent of the Zoning <br />Code." <br />In the opimon of sU0this criterion is met. <br />12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the <br />applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difftculty .’ <br />The nature of the property is such that a variance is required for any alteration or <br />addition to the home. In the opinion ofstaff this criterion b met. <br />Isaaes for Coasldenitioa <br />1 . The 2nd story addition will not increase the footprint of the existing residence and <br />will not increase strucniral coverage or hardcover. <br />2. Will the views from the adjacent residences be affected by the proposed addition? <br />3. Does the shape of the property situated on a peninsula and the fact that most of <br />the lot is located in the 0-7S ’ zone constitute hardships that are unique to the <br />property? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff RccomaieBdattoB <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as <br />requested.