My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:38:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />GITYofORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. __Si ^ « O <br />A. Existing hardcover in the 0-75’ zone is 306 s.f. or 4.1 fc. Existing <br />hardcover in the 75*250’ zone is 8,011 s.f. or 44^. Applicants propose <br />to remove all landscape beds lined with plastic or fabric on the property, <br />resulting in 0*75* hardcover of 12 s.f. or 0.25e where no lurdcover is <br />allowed, and 5,777 s.f. or 31.75i in the 75-250’ zone where only 25^ <br />hardcover is normally ailoued. <br />B. Planning Commission fmds that the removal of landscape bed hardcover <br />is a significant reduction and brings the propeny closer to conformit} with <br />the Cit> codes. <br />C. The proposed addition meets ilie requi-ed side and lakcshorc setbacks and <br />does not wiiwroach paai the average lakcshorc setback. <br />D. Proposed lot coverage by structures will be 11.15c, significantly less thati <br />the 15 % strucmral coverage allowed by the zoning code. <br />E. An enclosed screen porch constructed ever the existing deck without a <br />permit should be subject to an after-the-fact building permit and review of <br />the construction by the inspection depanment to ensure code compliance. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, repons by Cit>- staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the cficci of the proposed variance on the health, safet>' and <br />welfare of the communin ’. <br />The City Council finds that tlie conditions existing oti iliis propeny arc peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other propeny in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affcwt traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propeny; would not merely <br />sers’c as a convenience to the applicants, but is ne.essarv* to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficult)-; is necessar)’ to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Cit>*. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />.•*
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.