My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
04-21-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:38:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In Oclober, 2002, the property ouTiers ^>plied for a building permit (Pennit #P05705) to repair <br />their existing lakeside deck. At the footing inspection, the Building Inspector determined that the <br />deck could not be repaired due to excessive rotting. The property o\Miers were informed that a <br />new deck would require \-ariance approval. <br />DI scuss Iob: <br />Setback from the OHWL of l.ake Minnetonka <br />The existing deck is located 68.3’ from the OH^X of Lake Minnetonka and it is proposed to be <br />replaced in the same location. As it exists, the deck is “u-shaped” and the most lokeward <br />protrusions are 68.3’ from the OHWL. <br />Although the applicants are requesting to remodel the existing deck to fill in the ’*u” area with <br />deck, they do not propose to go any closer to the lake than what exists. Therefore, there is no <br />change proposed for the setback from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. <br />Hardcover <br />0-73 ’ Setback Zone <br />There exists 8,709.75 s.f. of area within this setback zone. Of this area. 586 s.f. (6.7*/o) is existing <br />hardcover where none is permitted. The existing hardcover consists of a portion of the deck, a <br />concrete patio, driveway and concrete steps. <br />The deck, located above a portion of the concrete patio, is attached to the house and supported by <br />posts, placed 4” outside the concrete patio, on the ground. Therefore, the additional deck <br />proposed to fill In the existing “u-shape” of the deck will add 4” of hardcover along 19.7’ of <br />width or 6.57 s.f. Given this, the hardcover within this setback zone will increase to 593 s.f <br />(6.8*/i). <br />In the 1989 lot split application, a portion of the driveway (488 s.f.), located from the north side <br />of the garage to the west lot line, was shown “to be removed"’ on the surv ey. Of this area. 189 s f <br />is located within the 0-75’ setback zone. If this area of the driveway was removed, the hardcover <br />would be reduced to 404 s.f. (4.6%). <br />73 '-230 ‘ Setback Zone <br />There c.xists 12.339.75 s.f. of area within this setback zone. Of this area, 6.449 s.f (52.3%) is <br />existing hardcover where 3,085 s.f (25%) is permitted. There are no hardcover additions <br />proposed in this zone. <br />If the area of the drivoway proposed to be reduced in the 1989 lot split was removed, the amount <br />of hardcover in this setback zone would be reduced by 299 s.f to 6,150 s.f (49.8®/*). <br />Average Lakeshore Setback <br />The existing deck encroaches 22* into the average lakeshore setback. The proposed deck is not <br />proposed to encroach any further into the setback. The proposed deck will not change the <br />existing views of the lake from the neighboring properties. <br />•0i-2S84 John and Cheryl Fiebetkorn <br />4'17,2003 <br />Page 3 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.