Laserfiche WebLink
Lot Coverage Bv Structure <br />The existing structures on the property include the house with lakeside deck and pool <br />maintenance shed, totaling 3,074 s.f. (14.6%). Since the deck is proposed to increase in area from <br />399 s.f. to 550 s.f., the structural coverage increases to 3.225 s.f. (15.3 “/o) where no more than <br />3,157 s.f. (15%) is permined. <br />Hardship: <br />The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit B. The applicants should also <br />be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues forCoosMeration: <br />1. The deck has existed in this location since 1972; <br />2. The proposed deck replacement and addition will not change the structural setback from <br />the OHUl. of Lake Minnetonka or the average lakeshore setback; <br />3. The additional deck will increase lot coverage by structures by 151 s.f.; <br />4. The proposal will add 6.67 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75’ setback zone and will not <br />increase hardcover in the 75’ to 250 ’ setback zone; <br />5. To reduce hardcover in both setback zones, 488 s.f. of driveway could be removed; <br />6. There exists 87.5 $.f. of driveway encroaching onto the neighboring propertv that should <br />be removed; . <br />7. The deck would continue to provide a landing for two sliding glass doors located on the <br />lakeside of the house; <br />8. There is an existing door that opens from the lakeside of the garage to the concrete patio; <br />9. The neighbors’ views of the lake are not greatly affected by the location of the deck, and <br />10. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />Staff Rcconmeadations: <br />The proposed deck expansion increases the amount of structural co\ erage on the property be) ond <br />the 15% limit and increases hardcover in the 0-75’ setback zone, increasing the norKonformity. <br />Therefore, staff can not support the proposed addition (filling in the “u” area). <br />Staff can support Utc deck replacement as it exists today, without the expansion, if the following <br />hardcover removals are completed prior to footing inspection: <br />1. 87.5 s.f of driveway encroaching onto the neighboring property; and <br />2. 488 s.f. of driveway, reducing hardcover to 404 s.f. (4.6%) in the 0-75’ setback zone <br />and to 6.150 s.f. (49.8%) in the 75’-250 ’ setback zone. <br />H0S'28S-I John and Cheryl Fiebelkom <br />4/17,200) <br />Page 4 <^)