04-21-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pcrtiaent Code ScctioBs: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2and Section 10.S6,Subd. 16(CX1): Stniclurcwithio 75*: Structures shall be set back a minimuni of 75’ from the (929.4’) of lakes classified as General Development (Request To allow a setback of 68.3’ from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where 75’ is requir^). 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (LXl) & (2): Hardcover within 75*: Within 75’ of the shoreline there shall be no e.xcavating, filling, hardcov er, iemporar>’ or permanent structures. (Request: To allow 593 s.f (6.8%) hardcover within the 0 to 75’ lakeshore setback zone where none is permitted). 3. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (LKI) & (2): Hardcover within 75*: Within 75’ of the shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hardcover, temporar>' or permanent structures. (Request: To allow 593 s.f. (6.8%) hardcover within the 0 to 75’ lakeshore setback zone where none is permitted). 4. Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (D) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (CK6): Average Lakeshore Setback: The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrtisions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. (Request: To allow an encroachment of 22' into the average lakeshore setback). 5. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C): Lot Coverage By Structure: For all lots of 0-1.99 acres in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. EXCEPTION: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1,500 s.f. of lot coverage by a principal residence and garage structures. (Request: To permit 3.225 s.f. (15.3%) of lot coverage by structure w here 3.157 s.f (15®/i) is permitted) History: In the summer of 1988, the property owners constructed a pool, spa and pool equipment building in the 0-75’ setback zone without City approval. In April 1989, the property owners applied for after-the-fact variances for hardcover on the 0-75’ setback zone; average lakeshore setback; structural setback from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka; and a side setback variance for the pool equipment building (Zoning File /^I353, Resolution 1^2620). The requested variances were denied because a hardship could not be determined for additional hardcover within the setback zone. The owners were required to remove the pool and spa and fully restore the property. The pool equipment building was permitted to remain for the time being, pending an application for a lot line rearrangement. In June 1989, property owners were granted a lot line rearrangement (adding up to 20* in lot width from the property to the southeast) and an after-the-fact structure to structure variance (Zoning File #1401. Resolution #2640-A) to keep the pool equipment building where it was constructed on the southeast side of the house. The surv ey w ith this application show s a portion of the driveway to be removed. However, the resolution does not reference any required hardcover remov als and the driveway has not changed to date. John and Chen ! Fiebelkom 4'n. 2003 Pate 2 €f 5