Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />ii <br />THE* FARM AT LONG LAKE - 820 Brown Road North <br />Subdivision <br />Page 6 #317 <br />3. Assurance of adequate on-site septic systems on all lots - <br />possible conflict with City's position of no municipal sewering <br />of this area <br />After a lengthy discussion the Planning Commission agreed that many of <br />the issues would have been resolved before approving the preliminary plat <br />had they not felt rushed into a decision just before Christmas holidays. <br />The Planning Commission tabled the proposal because many of the Important <br />issues were unresolved for lack of data. <br />The Planning Commission Instructed the Zoning Administrator to request <br />of the City Administrator that this proposal be added to the agenda for <br />the Council meeting scheduled for March 16, 1978. The Commission felt <br />the urgency would require some direction from the'City Attorney and <br />City Council. They requested some direction on the following issues: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Private road - width, surface, grade and drainage requirements <br />Conservation and pasture easements - determination of boundaries and <br />use <br />On-site septic systems - necessity of soil borings and locating <br />primary and alternate drain fields <br />Private access easement between Lots 19 and 21 as alternate access for <br />Lots 20 and 22 from private road, Outlot C - should this easement be <br />indicated on plat or in title <br />Pedestrian easement on Lot 7 to shoreline of Long Lake - extent and <br />limits of use - possible conflict with City's policy of restriction <br />of riparian rights for properties not located on shoreline <br />Report from City Attorney confirming agreement with interpretations <br />in letter from developer's attorney, Steven Pflaum, dated 3-7-78 <br />Fence on wetlands - is variance necessary <br />Chairwoman McDon*^ld suggested that one member of the Planning Commission <br />attend the next Council meeting to represent the position of the <br />Commission. <br />The Planning Commission Informed Tim Adams that after obtaining direction <br />on these Issues from the Council, the Commission would review the proposal <br />again conditioned on developer providing the following additional material: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Location of all existing structures in reference to proposed lot <br />lines so variances can be addressed <br />Private road detail (approved by City Engineer) <br />Should private access easement between Lots 19 and 21 be indicated <br />on plat or in title (approval of City Attorney) <br />Location of proposed fences on wetlands if variances are necessary <br />1 <br />) <br />J